Research Article - Journal of Experimental Neurology (2021) Volume 2, Issue 1
Glutaminergic Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Modulates the Behavioral Response to Acute and Chronic Methylphenidate
Nicholas King, Thomas Mink, Natasha Kharas, Nachum Dafny*
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Health at the McGovern Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston TX 77030, United States
- *Corresponding Author:
- Nachum Dafny
Received date: February 12, 2021; Accepted date: March 18, 2021
Citation: King N, Mink T, Kharas N, Dafny N. Glutaminergic Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Modulates the Behavioral
Response to Acute and Chronic Methylphenidate. J Exp Neurol. 2021;2(1): 49-61.
Copyright: © 2021 King N, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Methylphenidate (MPD) is a psychostimulant that is widely used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and is being
increasingly misused as a recreational drug and cognitive enhancer. MPD acts on the reward system of the CNS through specific
signaling pathways to produce its effects on behavior, including tolerance, withdrawal, and sensitization. The nucleus accumbens
(NAc) is one of the predominant components of this system, however the role of the NAc’s glutaminergic system in the behavioral
response to MPD has not been studied. The objective of this study was to assess the role of glutaminergic signaling and the response
to acute and chronic MPD exposure as measured by three different locomotive behaviors following selective bilateral lesions.
Three groups of n=8 rats were used: control, sham NAc lesions, and glutaminergic-specific (ibotenic acid toxin) NAc lesions. On
experimental day (ED) 1, all groups received saline injections to establish a baseline. On ED 2, NAc surgeries took place, followed by
a 5-day recovery period (ED 3-7). On ED 8 saline was given to obtain a post-surgical baseline. Groups then received six daily MPD
2.5 mg/kg injections (ED 9-14) to produce a chronic effect, behavioral sensitization in this study, then three days of washout with no
injection (ED 15-17), followed by a re-challenge with the previous 2.5 mg/kg MPD dose on ED 18. Locomotive activity was recorded
for 60 minutes after each injection by a computerized animal activity monitoring system. All groups showed an increase in behavioral
activity following acute MPD exposure, and developed behavioral sensitization following chronic MPD exposure that was maintained
after three days of MPD washout. Compared to controls and sham lesions, the horizontal activity response was significantly (P<0.05)
attenuated both acutely and chronically following glutaminergic selective ibotenic acid lesions to the NAc however the other indices
showed no change. This indicates that glutaminergic signaling in the NAc plays a role in modulating the response to acute and chronic
Methylphenidate, Ritalin, Nucleus accumbens, Lesion, Sensitization, Glutamate
Methylphenidate (MPD), more commonly known at Ritalin® or Concerta®, is a psychostimulant that is prescribed to treat behavioral disorders such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but is increasingly being misused and abused as a cognitive performance enhancer or recreational stimulant in normal individuals [1-5]. This has been driven by the rapid increase in patients diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) for which MPD is the drug of choice [6-10], as well as the rise in non-prescription use of MPD for
academic enhancement and recreation [7,11-15].
This is of concern as MPD shares pharmacologic characteristics with other addictive psychostimulants such as amphetamine and cocaine, and could thus share similar addictive potential [6,16-20]. MPD, like amphetamine and cocaine, acts as an indirect dopamine agonist by inhibiting the dopamine reuptake at the presynaptic terminal, leading to increased dopamine within the synaptic cleft [21-23]. Acute MPD exposure produces an increase in behavioral locomotor activity; chronic use elicits sensitization, tolerance, and/or withdrawal which are behavioral markers indicating a substance has the potential to elicit dependence [17,24-29]. Sensitization is a
sustained increase in behavioral activity beyond the acute effect following chronic administration of a substance
The central nervous system’s (CNS) reward system is known to participate in the long-term changes associated with substance abuse [32-37]. The circuit consists of multiple CNS structures, however the core pathway is the mesolimbic pathway in which dopaminergic neurons from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) project to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and the ventral striatum, then onwards to the prefrontal cortex (PFC). The Nucleus Accumbems (NAc) is a reward circuit structure that is critical for motivation, emotion, limbic functions, and motor execution [30,38-43]. Non-specific and dopaminergic specific lesions to the NAc have shown it to be critical to regulating the response to MPD [44,45], however the role of the glutaminergic system remains uninvestigated. Glutaminergic signaling has been shown to modulate the long-term response between other reward/motive circuit nuclei [26,28,29,36,44,46-60], and it known to participate in inputs to the NAc, however its role in the acute and chronic response to MPD is unknown.
This study set out to determine if the glutaminergic system of the NAc participates in the response to MPD. To do this, 3 groups of animals were used: NAc intact controls, sham lesions, and specific glutaminergic chemical lesions. Animals were exposed to acute and chronic (repetitive) MPD and the response was monitored with a computerized monitoring system in an open field assay.
Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 170- 180g were obtained from Harlan Labs (Indianapolis, IN, USA). Animals were individually placed in plexiglass cages (40.5x40.5x31.5 cm in dimension) in a soundproof room without disturbance to the experimental environment for 4-5 days to acclimate prior to experimentation. These cages served as the home and test cage. Animals were maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle that began at 06:00. Food and water were provided ad libitum throughout the experiment, and the temperature was kept at 21 ± 2°C with a relative humidity of 37-42%. At the beginning of the experimental phase, the rats were weighed and randomly divided into three groups: NAc-intact controls (n=8), sham operation (n=8), and ibotenic acid chemical ablation of the glutaminergic system (n=8). This protocol was approved by our Animal Welfare Committee and carried out in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Experimental procedure (Table 1)
Rats were given 4-5 days to acclimate in their home cage before experimentation. On experimental day 1 (ED 1-Sal) animals were weighed and 0.8 mL of 0.9% saline was administered intra-peritoneal (ip). All animals weighed 200-220 g at that time. Locomotive behavioral activity was recorded for 120 minutes post-injection to establish a baseline prior to surgical manipulation. On experimental day 2 (ED 2), the lesion and sham groups underwent surgery and were then allowed to recover for approximately 5 days (ED 3-7). On experimental day 8, saline was re-administered (ED 8-Sal) and postsurgical locomotor activity was recorded for 120 minutes to compare with the pre-surgical baseline (ED 1-Sal). Starting on experimental day 9 (ED 9-MPD), daily injections of 2.5 mg/kg MPD (Mallinckrodt, Hazelwood MO) dissolved in 0.8 mL of 0.9% saline were administer for 6 consecutive days (ED 9-MPD to ED 14-MPD), and activity recorded for 120 minutes post-injection. This dose of 2.5 mg/kg MPD has been shown to be sufficient to elicit behavioral sensitization in rats in previous doseresponse experiments [27-29,48,51,61-68]. For the next 3 days (ED 15-17), animals received no injections (the washout period). After the washout period (ED 18-MPD), the rats were re-challenged with MPD at the previous dose of 2.5 mg/kg and behavioral activity was observed for 60 minutes (the expression phase). All boluses were given at approximately 07:30 in the morning in 0.8 mL volumes.
Surgical Procedure (ED 2)
On ED 2, the sham operation group, the electrolytic lesion group, the 6-OHDA group, and the ibotenic acid group animals were anaesthetized with 60 mg/ kg pentobarbital and placed in the stereotactic apparatus. An incision was to expose the skull. For surgery, holes were drilled in the skull 1.7 mm anterior from the bregma and 1.6 mm lateral to the midline bilaterally based on the co-ordinates derived from Paximos and Watson Rat Brain Atlas .
Sham operation: For the sham group, the animal was anesthetized, the skin opened, holes drilled in the skull, and a 27G cannula was inserted bilaterally to a depth of 6.8 mm but no agent administered. The cannulas were then removed, and the incision closed with wound staples.
NAc Glutaminergic system ablation: For the glutaminergic ablation group, ibotenic acid, a glutaminergic toxin, was employed [70-74]. A 27G cannula was inserted bilaterally to a depth of 6.8 mm. 5 μg of ibotenic acid was dissolved in 5 μl of 0.9% normal saline was slowly infused then the cannula left in place for 6 minutes to allow for full diffusion. The cannulas were then removed, and the incision closed with wound staples.
Behavioral locomotive activity was recorded using the open field computerized animal activity monitoring system (CAAM, AccuScan Instruments, Inc., Columbus OH). The CAAM system consists of 2 arrays of 16 infrared light beams with sensors on the opposite side, spaced every 2.5 cm that cross orthogonally through the plexiglass cage. Sensor polling frequency was set at 100 Hz. Movement of the rats interrupted the infrared light beams, and each beam-break detected by a sensor was collected as an event by the AccuScan Analyzer and transferred to a computer. Events over a 5-minute period were summed, giving 12 5-minute bins for each hour of observation. These bins were transferred to the OASIS data collecting software and three indices of behavioral locomotion were compiled for each collection period: total travelling distance (TD)- all forward locomotion in cm, horizontal activity (HA)- the overall movement in the lower level of the cage, and the number of stereotypic movements (NOS)- episodes of purposeless, repetitive movement in the upper level of the sensors separated by at least 1 second.
Histology (Figure 1)
At the conclusion of the experiment, animals were overdosed with sodium pentobarbital and perfused with 10% formaldehyde. The brains were removed stored in 10% formaldehyde. 60 μm thickness corona l sections were cut, stained, and scanned with a high-resolution scanner to identify lesion size and location correlated to the NAc using the Paximos and Watson rat brain atlas  (Figure 1).
Rat behavioral locomotive activity was quantified by three compiled indices of movement (HA, TD, NOS) obtained in twelve 5-minute bins collected the hour after injections for each rat were averaged across each experimental group based on the experimental day to allow for comparisons. Post-surgical manipulation effects on baseline behavioral locomotor activity were determined by comparing the animal’s activity after a saline injection before and after the surgical intervention (ED 8-Sal vs. ED 1-Sal). The acute effects of MPD were determined by comparing the first day of MPD administration to the post-surgical baseline (ED 9-MPD vs. ED 8-Sal). The effects of repetitive (chronic) MPD exposure over 6 consecutive days on behavioral locomotor activity were determined by comparing the final day of administration to the first, i.e. the induction phase (ED 14-MPD vs. ED 9-MPD). The effects of chronic MPD exposure following a washout period on behavioral locomotor activity were determined by comparing MPD re-challenge to the initial administration, i.e the expression phase (ED 18-MPD vs. ED 9-MPD) (See Table 1). Significance of change among these withingroup
comparisons was determined by ANOVA, with repeated measures with adjustments for correlation
among measurements within each animal. Post ad hoc
comparisons were used to estimate changes between days
within groups. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically
significant. The effects of the ibotenic acid lesion were
determined by comparing the ibotenic acid lesion group to
both the control and sham groups on each of the recording
days (ED 1-Sal, ED 8-Sal, ED 9-MPD, ED 14-MPD, and
ED 18-MPD). Significance of change among the betweengroup
comparisons was determined with Turkey-Kramer
Honest Significant Difference (HSD) post hoc test. A
p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Group||Experimental Schedule|
|ED 1*||ED 2||ED 3-7||ED 8*||ED 9-14*||ED 15-17||ED 18*|
| Control|| Saline|| || || Saline|| MPD|| Washout||MPD re- challenge|
| Sham|| Saline|| Surgery|| Recovery|| Saline|| MPD|| Washout||MPD re- challenge|
|Ibotenic acid lesion|| Saline|| Surgery|| Recovery|| Saline|| MPD|| Washout||MPD re- challenge|
Table 1: Methylphenidate administration schedule. The table shows the experimental treatment protocol for the 5 groups of rats used. Each group consisted of N=8 rats. Displayed are the experimental days (ED’s) either normal saline or methylphenidate (MPD) 2.5 mg/kg ip was administered according to injection protocol, in a standardized volume of 0.8 ml at 07:30. * indicates day rats were behaviorally recorded post-injection. The experiment lasted 18 experimental days. The experimental schedule began after several days of acclimatization of the rats to their home/experimental cages.
Effect of MPD on activity (Figure 2)
Figure 2 shows the effect of the MPD administration on total distance (TD) traveled on the five recording days (ED 1-Sal, ED 8-Sal, ED 9-MPD, ED 14-MPD, and ED 18-MPD) for the NAc control, sham, and ibotenic acid lesion groups. Surgery with or without chemical intervention to the NAc (ED 8-Sal vs. ED 1-Sal) did not lead to a statistically significant change in TD for the sham and ibotenic acid lesion groups as compared to the control group (Figure 2). Similar results were seen in horizontal activity (HA) and number of stereotypic movements (NOS). This observation indicates that animal handling, injection volume, and injection procedure were cons istent, and that the surgical intervention did not modulate baseline activity. The administration of 2.5 mg/kg MPD yielded a statistically significant (* p<0.05) increase in TD following MPD exposure for all groups relative to their postsurgical baseline (ED 9-MPD vs. ED 8-Sal) (Figure 2). Similar results were seen in HA and NOS. Administration of a repetitive 2.5 mg/kg MPD dose for an additional five consecutive days resulted in a further statistically significant (? p<0.05) increase in TD beyond the acute effect of MPD for all groups (ED 14-MPD vs. ED 9-MPD) (Figure 2). Similar results were seen in HA and NOS. This
further augmentation in locomotive behavior following
repeated exposure to MPD confirms that 2.5 mg/kg MPD
induces behavioral sensitization. Re-challenge with the
same 2.5 mg/kg MPD dose after a three-day washout
period following chronic MPD exposure (six days of MPD
administration) caused all groups to again show a further
statistically significant (? p<0.05) increase in TD as
compared to acute MPD administration (ED 18-MPD vs.
ED 14-MPD) (Figure 2). Similar results were seen in HA
and NOS. This continued augmentation of the response to
MPD even after drug washout is the continued expression
of sensitization to chronic psychostimulant use, i.e. the
Effect of ibotenic acid lesion on TD (Figure 3)
Figure 3 shows the effects of ibotenic acid lesions to the NAc on TD by comparing each group (control, sham, and ibotenic acid lesion) to the other two groups on each experimental day. No significant difference was seen between any of the groups on any of the experimental days, i.e. all groups behaved similarly in response to MPD exposure.
Effect of ibotenic acid lesion on HA (Figure 4)
Figure 4 shows the effects of ibotenic acid lesions to the NAc on HA by comparing each group (control, sham, and ibotenic acid lesion) to the other two groups on each experimental day. Compared to the control and sham groups, the group that received lesions to the NAc showed a significant difference between the control (? p<0.05) and the sham (* p<0.05) groups in response to MPD both acutely (ED 9-MPD) and chronically (ED 14-MPD and ED 18-MPD).
Effect of ibotenic acid lesion on NOS (Figure 5)
Figure 5 shows the effects of ibotenic acid lesions to the NAc on NOS by comparing each group (control, sham, and ibotenic acid lesion) to the other two groups on each experimental day. No significant difference was seen between any of the groups on ED 9-MPD or ED 14-MPD. On ED 18-MPD, a significant difference was seen between the sham lesion group and both the NAc intact control (? p<0.05) and the ibotenic acid lesion groups (* p<0.05). No significant difference was seen between the control and ibotenic acid lesion group.
This experiment was conducted to determine the role of glutaminergic signaling in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in the response to acute and chronic methylphenidate (MPD). The findings of this work show that in NAc intact animals, 2.5 mg/kg MPD results in an acute increase in activity in all locomotor indices studied (TD, HA, NOS, Figure 2), and that chronic repetitive exposure results in behavioral sensitization- the further significant increase above the acute effect (Figure 2). This effect is clearly modulated following a specific bilateral glutaminergic lesion to the NAc with ibotenic acid, with HA specifically showing a consistent significant difference from the NAc intact control and sham groups following both acute and chronic 2.5mg/kg MPD exposure (Figure 4). This difference was absent in the other indices (TD and NOS, Figures 3 and 5 respectively). The sham lesion alone shows a difference from the control and ibotenic lesion groups, which appears to be a statistical artifact as the magnitude is similar to the NAc intact controls and the ibotenic acid lesion group and the difference is not seen on ED 14-MPD when the chronic effect of MPD is also manifested.
The NAc is a structure located near the anterior commissure that is critical for the motivation and rewardseeking behavior. It is composed primarily of dopaminergic medium spiny neurons (MSN’s) and is divided into a shell and a core that mediate different functions [75-80]. The NAc receives input primarily from the VTA, in addition to inputs from the substantia nigra, the amygdala, the hippocampus, and the PFC. The NAc outputs ascend to various basal ganglia and midbrain structures including the substantia nigra, the VTA, the ventral pallidum, the thalamus, the subpallidus, and the stria terminalis [78,81-84].
Previously reported lesions to the NAc have confirmed its role in mediating the behavioral response to MPD. Psychostimulants such as MPD cause an increase in dopaminergic transmission from the VTA to the NAc, and increased dopamine within the NAc leads to increased locomotion [85-87]. Direct chronic microinjection of dopaminergic agonists such as amphetamine, cocaine, or morphine into the NAc can induce sensitization [38,88-96], suggesting that the NAc is involved in the induction of behavioral sensitization. Non-specific lesions to the NAc have been shown to lead to an enhanced acute effect of MPD, but absent long-term behavioral changes such as sensitization following chronic exposure . This this is also seen with amphetamine, cocaine, and nicotine [97-103]. Dopaminergic lesions to the NAc have produced more complex behavioral changes, with some animals exhibiting no increase in locomotor activity acute MPD exposure and others showing a significantly elevated locomotor activity following MPD exposure . Animals that responded to MPD acutely did not develop behavioral sensitization,
while those that showed no behavioral change following
the dopaminergic lesion did show behavioral sensitization
. This work was noted to not determine lesion accuracy
which could explain the dichotomy of animal responses,
however it still indicated that accumbal dopaminergic
signaling is critical for the response to psychostimulants.
Glutaminergic signaling in the NAc has been unexplored till this present study, but has been shown to be critical in other reward circuit nuclei [26,28,29,36,44,46-60]. This study found that following specific glutaminergic ablation of the NAc by ibotenic acid, animals showed the same general response to acute and chronic MPD exposure as the control and sham NAc lesion groups, with an acute increase in behavioral activity following MPD and then further augmentation with chronic exposure (Figure 2). However, when the different behavioral expressions (HA, TD, NOS) to MPD exposure were compared between groups, a significant attenuation in the behavioral activity comprising forward motion as measured by HA was seen following glutaminergic-specific lesions to the NAc (Figures 3-5). This attenuation of HA indicates that glutaminergic signaling in the NAc is critical in modulating behavior and influences signaling pathways differently. This fits with the current knowledge that glutaminergic inputs to the NAc come from other reward circuit nuclei [104,105], and with other work showing that glutaminergic signaling is responsible for modulating the core effect of MPD at other reward circuit nuclei [26,28,29,36,44,46-60]. It also seems to indicate that different subcortical circuits govern different behavioral responses, as animals with glutaminergic lesions to the NAc, HA exhibited significantly less behavioral activity in response to both acute and chronic MPD exposure. HA is a measure of forward motion, and can be regarded as a goal-directed behavior (although in this experiment the open field assay is not designed to stimulate this mode of activity) which would seem to imply that glutaminergic signaling specifically modulates motivational circuits versus generalized motor modulation, which would involve both TD and NOS.
Previous work initially determined the NAc shell to be critical for the excitatory response to psychostimulants, as it showed the greatest response in response to their administration [90,95,106,107]. However, it is increasingly being recognized that the NAc core also participates in the response to psychostimulants [108-111], and that both play a role in motivation and behavioral actions [112-114]. The results seen here agree with emerging work showing that while the NAc core and shell are anatomically distinct, distinct circuits between them govern different behavioral responses [108-114]. Targeting a spherical shell structure with a chemical lesion presents a substantial technical problem and further interrogation of these distinctions will require further work. The strength of the paper is the using of local injection of specific neurotoxin to eliminate the glutaminergic system in the NAc. Additional experiments are needed to use specific neurotoxin to study other neurotransmitters signaling.
The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a rewards circuit structure that is critical for the response to MPD. It is divided into a shell and core that serve distinct roles in the response to psychostimulants such as MPD. Three different locomotive behaviors were studied, and it was found that lesions to the glutaminergic signaling pathways of the NAc result in significant attenuation of forward motion HA compared to control and sham groups. This difference was not seen in the other behaviors (TD and NOS), indicating that different NAc circuits govern specific behavioral expressions to acute and chronic MPD.
This study was supported by a National Institute of
Health grant (NIH DA-027220).
- Dalsgaard S, Nielsen HS, Simonsen M. Five-fold
increase in national prevalence rates of attention-deficit/
hyperactivity disorder medications for children and
adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, attentiondeficit/
hyperactivity disorder, and other psychiatric
disorders: a Danish register-based study. Journal of
Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2013 Sep 16;23(7):432-9.
- Frauger E, Amaslidou D, Spadari M, Allaria-
Lapierre V, Braunstein D, Sciortino V, et al. Patterns of
methylphenidate use and assessment of its abuse among the
general population and individuals with drug dependence.
European Addiction Research. 2016;22(3):119-26.
- King SA, Casavant MJ, Spiller HA, Hodges NL,
Chounthirath T, Smith GA. Pediatric ADHD medication
exposures reported to US poison control centers.
Pediatrics. 2018 Jun;141(6):e20173872.
- Pauly V, Frauger E, Lepelley M, Mallaret M, Boucherie
Q, Micallef J. Patterns and profiles of methylphenidate
use both in children and adults. British Journal of Clinical
Pharmacology. 2018 Jun;84(6):1215-27.
- Visser SN, Danielson ML, Bitsko RH, Holbrook JR,
Kogan MD, Ghandour RM, et al. Trends in the parentreport
of health care provider-diagnosed and medicated
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: United States,
2003–2011. Journal of the American Academy of Child &
Adolescent Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 1;53(1):34-46.
- Accardo P, Blondis TA. What’s all the fuss about
Ritalin?. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2001 Jan 1;138(1):6-9.
- Fond G, Gavaret M, Vidal C, Brunel L, Riveline JP,
Micoulaud-Franchi JA, et al. (Mis) use of prescribed
stimulants in the medical student community: motives
and behaviors: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Medicine. 2016 Apr;95(16):e3366.
- Froehlich TE, Lanphear BP, Epstein JN, Barbaresi
WJ, Katusic SK, Kahn RS. Prevalence, recognition, and
treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a
national sample of US children. Archives of Pediatrics &
Adolescent Medicine. 2007 Sep 1;161(9):857-64.
- Stanford C, Tannock R (eds). Behavioral neuroscience
of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its treatment.
Springer Science & Business Media; 2012 Jan 10.
- Storebø OJ, Simonsen E, Gluud C. Methylphenidate
for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and
adolescents. Jama. 2016 May 10;315(18):2009-10.
- Bogle KE, Smith BH. Illicit methylphenidate use:
a review of prevalence, availability, pharmacology, and
consequences. Current Drug Abuse Reviews. 2009 May
- Cox ER, Motheral BR, Henderson RR, Mager D.
Geographic variation in the prevalence of stimulant
medication use among children 5 to 14 years old: results
from a commercially insured US sample. Pediatrics. 2003
- Djezzar S, Courné MA, Richard N. EPA-0748–
Methylphenidate abuse: results of a french survey.
European Psychiatry. 2014;29(S1):1.
- Greely H, Sahakian B, Harris J, Kessler RC, Gazzaniga
M, Campbell P, Farah MJ. Towards responsible use of
cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature. 2008
- Wilens TE, Adler LA, Adams J, Sgambati S, Rotrosen
J, Sawtelle R, et al. Misuse and diversion of stimulants
prescribed for ADHD: a systematic review of the literature.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent
Psychiatry. 2008 Jan 1;47(1):21-31.
- Diaz Heijtz R, Scott L, Forssberg H. Alteration of
dopamine D1 receptor-mediated motor inhibition and
stimulation during development in rats is associated with
distinct patterns of c-fos mRNA expression in the frontalstriatal
circuitry. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2004
- Kuczenski R, Segal DS. Effects of methylphenidate on extracellular dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine:comparison with amphetamine. Journal of Neurochemistry. 1997 May;68(5):2032-7.
- Kharas N, Yang P, Castro-Alvarado D, Rose K, Dafny
N. Exposure to methylphenidate in adolescence and
adulthood modulates cross-sensitization to amphetamine
in adulthood in three genetically variant female rat strains.
Behavioural Brain Research. 2019 Apr 19;362:36-45.
- Teo SK, Stirling DI, Hoberman AM, Christian MS,
Thomas SD, Khetani VD. D-methylphenidate and D,
L-methylphenidate are not developmental toxicants in rats
and rabbits. Birth Defects Research Part B: Developmental
and Reproductive Toxicology. 2003 Apr;68(2):162-71.
- Volkow ND, Ding YS, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Logan
J, Gatley JS, et al. Is methylphenidate like cocaine?:
Studies on their pharmacokinetics and distribution in the
human brain. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1995 Jun
- Gatley SJ, Volkow ND, Gifford AN, Fowler JS, Dewey
SL, Ding YS, et al. Dopamine-transporter occupancy after
intravenous doses of cocaine and methylphenidate in mice
and humans. Psychopharmacology. 1999 Sep;146(1):93-
- John CE, Jones SR. Voltammetric characterization of
the effect of monoamine uptake inhibitors and releasers
on dopamine and serotonin uptake in mouse caudateputamen
and substantia nigra slices. Neuropharmacology.
2007 Jun 1;52(8):1596-605.
- Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Fischman M, Foltin
R, Abumrad NN, et al., Methylphenidate and cocaine have
a similar in vivo potency to block dopamine transporters
in the human brain. Life Sciences. 1999 May 28;65(1):PL7-
- Algahim MF, Yang PB, Wilcox VT, Burau KD, Swann
AC, Dafny N. Prolonged methylphenidate treatment
alters the behavioral diurnal activity pattern of adult male
Sprague-Dawley rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and
Behavior. 2009 Mar 1;92(1):93-9.
- Gaytan O, Sripada S, Swann A, Dafny N. Blockade
of sensitization to methylphenidate by MK-801: partial
dissociation from motor effects. Neuropharmacology.
2001 Jan 1;40(2):298-309.
- Lee MJ, Swann AC, Dafny N. Methylphenidate
sensitization is prevented by prefrontal cortex lesion.
Brain Research Bulletin. 2008 May 15;76(1-2):131-40.
- Yang PB, Amini B, Swann AC, Dafny N. Strain
differences in the behavioral responses of male rats to chronically administered methylphenidate. Brain
Research. 2003a May 9;971(2):139-52.
- Yang PB, Swann AC, Dafny N. Sensory-evoked
potentials recordings from the ventral tegmental area,
nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex, and caudate nucleus
and locomotor activity are modulated in dose–response
characteristics by methylphenidate. Brain Research.
2006a Feb 16;1073:164-74.
- Yang PB, Swann AC, Dafny N. Chronic administration
of methylphenidate produces neurophysiological and
behavioral sensitization. Brain Research. 2007a May
- Dafny N, Yang PB. The role of age, genotype,
sex, and route of acute and chronic administration of
methylphenidate: a review of its locomotor effects. Brain
Research Bulletin. 2006 Feb 15;68(6):393-405.
- Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug
craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.
Brain Research Reviews. 1993 Sep 1;18(3):247-91.
- Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. From the ventral to the
dorsal striatum: devolving views of their roles in drug
addiction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2013
- Gardner EL. Brain reward mechanisms. Substance
Abuse: A comprehensive Textbook. 1997:51-85.
- Kalivas PW. Introduction: The circuitry mediating
the translation of motivational stimuli into adaptive motor
responses. Limbic Motor Circuits and Neuropsychiatry.
- Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J,
Childress AR, et al. Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal
striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction.
Journal of Neuroscience. 2006 Jun 14;26(24):6583-8.
- Wolf ME. The role of excitatory amino acids in
behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants.
Progress in Neurobiology. 1998 Apr 24;54(6):679-720.
- Woolverton WL, Johnson KM. Neurobiology of
cocaine abuse. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 1992
- Di Chiara G, Imperato A. Drugs abused by humans
preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations
in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1988 Jul
- Ikemoto S. Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection
systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex. Brain Research
Reviews. 2007 Nov 1;56(1):27-78.
- Haber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit:
linking primate anatomy and human imaging.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):4-26.
- Haber SN. Chapter 1—anatomy and connectivity of
the reward circuit. H of R and DM. Academic Press, New
York. 2017; pp:3-19.
- Koob GF, Bloom FE. Cellular and molecular
mechanisms of drug dependence. Science. 1988 Nov
- Oldehinkel M, Beckmann CF, Pruim RH, Van Oort
ES, Franke B, Hartman CA, et al. Attention-deficit/
hyperactivity disorder symptoms coincide with altered
striatal connectivity. Biological psychiatry: cognitive
neuroscience and neuroimaging. 2016 Jul 1;1(4):353-63.
- Podet A, Lee MJ, Swann AC, Dafny N. Nucleus
accumbens lesions modulate the effects of methylphenidate.
Brain Research Bulletin. 2010 Jul 30;82(5-6):293-301.
- Wanchoo SJ. Role of Dopamine of Nucleus Accumbens
in Behavioral Sensitization to Methylphenidate. UT
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston:
Dissertations and Theses. 2010 May 1:14.
- Bell K, Kalivas PW. Context-specific cross-sensitization
between systemic cocaine and intra-accumbens
AMPA infusion in the rat. Psychopharmacology. 1996
- Childress AR, Mozley PD, McElgin W, Fitzgerald
J, Reivich M, O’Brien CP. Limbic activation during cueinduced
cocaine craving. American Journal of Psychiatry.
1999 Jan 1;156(1):11-8.
- Claussen CM, Chong SL, Dafny N. Selective bilateral
lesion to caudate nucleus modulates the acute and chronic
methylphenidate effects. Pharmacology Biochemistry and
Behavior. 2012 Apr 1;101(2):208-16.
- Hemby SE, Horman B, Tang W. Differential regulation
of ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits following
cocaine self-administration. Brain research. 2005 Dec
- Hnasko TS, Hjelmstad GO, Fields HL, Edwards
RH. Ventral tegmental area glutamate neurons:
electrophysiological properties and projections. Journal of
Neuroscience. 2012 Oct 24;32(43):15076-85.
- Jones Z, Dafny N. Acute and chronic dose–response
effect of methylphenidate on ventral tegmental area
neurons correlated with animal behavior. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2014 Mar 1;121(3):327-45.
- Kalivas PW, Duffy P. Repeated cocaine administration
alters extracellular glutamate in the ventral tegmental
area. Journal of Neurochemistry. 1998 Apr;70(4):1497-
- King N, Floren S, Kharas N, Thomas M, Dafny
N. Glutaminergic signaling in the caudate nucleus is
required for behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate.
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2019 Sep
- Pierce RC, Bell K, Duffy P, Kalivas PW. Repeated
cocaine augments excitatory amino acid transmission
in the nucleus accumbens only in rats having developed
behavioral sensitization. Journal of Neuroscience. 1996
- Pierce RC, Reeder DC, Hicks J, Morgan ZR, Kalivas
PW. Ibotenic acid lesions of the dorsal prefrontal cortex
disrupt the expression of behavioral sensitization to
cocaine. Neuroscience. 1998 Feb 12;82(4):1103-14.
- Pierce RC, Kalivas PW. A circuitry model of the
expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetaminelike
psychostimulants. Brain Research Reviews. 1997 Oct
- Reid MS, Berger SP. Evidence for sensitization of
cocaine-induced nucleus accumbens glutamate release.
Neuroreport. 1996 May 1;7(7):1325-9.
- Wanchoo SJ, Swann AC, Dafny N. Descending
glutamatergic pathways of PFC are involved in acute and
chronic action of methylphenidate. Brain Research. 2009
- Wanchoo SJ, Lee MJ, Swann AC, Dafny N. Bilateral
six-hydroxydopamine administration to PFC prevents the
expression of behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate.
Brain Research. 2010 Feb 2;1312:89-100.
- White SR, Harris GC, Imel KM, Wheaton MJ. Inhibitory
effects of dopamine and methylenedioxymethamphetamine
(MDMA) on glutamate-evoked firing of nucleus accumbens
and caudate/putamen cells are enchanced following
cocaine self-administration. Brain Research. 1995 May
- Claussen CM, Dafny N. Caudate neuronal recording
in freely behaving animals following acute and chronic
dose response methylphenidate exposure. Pharmacology
Biochemistry and Behavior. 2015 Sep 1;136:21-30.
- Gaytan O, al-Rahim S, Swann A, Dafny N. Sensitization
to locomotor effects of methylphenidate in the rat. Life
sciences. 1997 Jul 18;61(8):PL101-7.
- Karim TJ, Reyes-Vazquez C, Dafny N. Comparison
of the VTA and LC response to methylphenidate: A
concomitant behavioral and neuronal study of adolescent
male rats. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2017 Sep
- Karim TJ, Aksel C, Kharas N, Reyes-Vasquez C, Dafny
N. Caudate nucleus neurons participate in methylphenidate
function: Behavioral and neuronal recordings from freely
behaving adolescent rats. Brain Rsearch Bulletin. 2018
- Yang PB, Swann AC, Dafny N. Chronic pretreatment
with methylphenidate induces cross-sensitization with
amphetamine. Life sciences. 2003b Oct 17;73(22):2899-
- Yang PB, Swann AC, Dafny N. Chronic methylphenidate
modulates locomotor activity and sensory evoked
responses in the VTA and NAc of freely behaving rats.
Neuropharmacology. 2006b Sep 1;51(3):546-56.
- Yang PB, Swann AC, Dafny N. Methylphenidate
treated at the test cage—dose-dependent sensitization or
tolerance depend on the behavioral assay used. Critical
Reviews™ in Neurobiology. 2007b;19(2):59-77.
- Yang PB, Cuellar III DO, Swann AC, Dafny N. Age
and genetic strain differences in response to chronic
methylphenidate administration. Behavioural Brain
Research. 2011 Mar 17;218(1):206-17.
- Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic
coordinates: hard cover edition. Elsevier; 2006 Nov 2.
- Kouvelas ED, Mitsacos A, Angelatou F, Hatziefthimiou
A, Tsiotos P, Voukelatou G. Glutamate receptors in
mammalian cerebellum: Alterations in human ataxic
disorders and cerebellar mutant mice. InCerebellar
degenerations: Clinical Neurobiology 1992 (pp. 123-137).
Springer, Boston, MA.
- Meldrum BS. Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the
brain: review of physiology and pathology. The Journal of
Nutrition. 2000 Apr 1;130(4):1007S-15S.
- McEntee WJ, Crook TH. Glutamate: its role in learning,
memory, and the aging brain. Psychopharmacology. 1993
- Shigeri Y, Seal RP, Shimamoto K. Molecular
pharmacology of glutamate transporters, EAATs and
VGLUTs. Brain Research Reviews. 2004 Jul 1;45(3):250-
- Schwarcz R, Hökfelt T, Fuxe K, Jonsson G, Goldstein M,
Terenius L. Ibotenic acid-induced neuronal degeneration: a morphological and neurochemical study. Experimental
Brain Research. 1979 Oct;37(2):199-216.
- Kim Y, Teylan MA, Baron M, Sands A, Nairn AC,
Greengard P. Methylphenidate-induced dendritic spine
formation and ΔFosB expression in nucleus accumbens.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009
- McGinty VB, Grace AA. Timing-dependent regulation
of evoked spiking in nucleus accumbens neurons by
integration of limbic and prefrontal cortical inputs.
Journal of neurophysiology. 2009 Apr;101(4):1823-35.
- Perez MF, Ford KA, Goussakov I, Stutzmann GE,
Hu XT. Repeated cocaine exposure decreases dopamine
D2-like receptor modulation of Ca2+ homeostasis in rat
nucleus accumbens neurons. Synapse. 2011 Feb;65(2):168-
- Salgado S, Kaplitt MG. The nucleus accumbens:
a comprehensive review. Stereotactic and Functional
- Zaborszky L, Alheid GF, Beinfeld MC, Eiden LE,
Heimer L, Palkovits M. Cholecystokinin innervation of the
ventral striatum: a morphological and radioimmunological
study. Neuroscience. 1985 Feb 1;14(2):427-53.
- Zahm DS, Brog JS. On the significance of subterritories
in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum.
Neuroscience. 1992 Oct 1;50(4):751-67.
- Brog JS, Salyapongse A, Deutch AY, Zahm DS. The
patterns of afferent innervation of the core and shell
in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum:
immunohistochemical detection of retrogradely
transported fluoro-gold. Journal of Comparative
Neurology. 1993 Dec 8;338(2):255-78.
- Groenewegen HJ, Wright CI, Beijer AV, Voorn P.
Convergence and segregation of ventral striatal inputs and
outputs. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
- Phillipson OT, Griffiths AC. The topographic order
of inputs to nucleus accumbens in the rat. Neuroscience.
1985 Oct 1;16(2):275-96.
- Williams DJ, Crossman AR, Slater P. The efferent
projections of the nucleus accumbens in the rat. Brain
Research. 1977 Jul 15;130(2):217-27.
- Anden NE, Jackson DM. Locomotor activity
stimulation in rats produced by dopamine in the nucleus
accumbens: potentiation by caffeine. Journal of Pharmacy
and Pharmacology. 1975 Sep;27(9):666-70.
- Austin MC, Kalivas PW. Dopaminergic involvement in
locomotion elicited from the ventral pallidum/substantia
innominata. Brain Research. 1991 Feb 22;542(1):123-31.
- Boye SM, Grant RJ, Clarke PB. Disruption of
dopaminergic neurotransmission in nucleus accumbens
core inhibits the locomotor stimulant effects of nicotine
and D-amphetamine in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2001
- Cadoni C, Solinas M, Di Chiara G. Psychostimulant
sensitization: differential changes in accumbal shell and
core dopamine. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2000
- Cornish JL, Kalivas PW. Repeated cocaine
administration into the rat ventral tegmental area produces
behavioral sensitization to a systemic cocaine challenge.
Behavioural Brain Research. 2001 Nov 29;126(1-2):205-9.
- Heidbreder C, Feldon J. Amphetamine-induced
neurochemical and locomotor responses are expressed
differentially across the anteroposterior axis of the
core and shell subterritories of the nucleus accumbens.
Synapse. 1998 Aug;29(4):310-22.
- Hooks MS, Jones GH, Liem BJ, Justice Jr JB.
Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine,
cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial
amphetamine infusions. Pharmacology Biochemistry and
Behavior. 1992 Nov 1;43(3):815-23.
- Kalivas PW, Weber BR. Amphetamine injection into
the ventral mesencephalon sensitizes rats to peripheral
amphetamine and cocaine. Journal of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics. 1988 Jun 1;245(3):1095-102.
- Paulson PE, Robinson TE. Sensitization to systemic
amphetamine produces an enhanced locomotor response
to a subsequent intra-accumbens amphetamine challenge
in rats. Psychopharmacology. 1991 May;104(1):140-1.
- Perugini M, Vezina P. Amphetamine administered to
the ventral tegmental area sensitizes rats to the locomotor
effects of nucleus accumbens amphetamine. Journal of
Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1994 Aug
- Swanson CJ, Heath S, Stratford TR, Kelley AE.
Differential behavioral responses to dopaminergic
stimulation of nucleus accumbens subregions in the rat.
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1997 Dec
- Vezina P, Stewart J. Amphetamine administered to the
ventral tegmental area but not to the nucleus accumbens
sensitizes rats to systemic morphine: lack of conditioned effects. Brain Research. 1990 May 14;516(1):99-106.
- Joyce EM, Stinus L, Iversen SD. Effect of injections
of 6-OHDA into either nucleus accumbens septi or
frontal cortex on spontaneous and drug-induced activity.
Neuropharmacology. 1983 Sep 1;22(9):1141-5.
- Kelly PH, Iversen SD. Selective 60HDA-induced
destruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: abolition
of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats.
European Journal of Pharmacology. 1976 Nov 1;40(1):45-
- Kelsey JE, Willmore EJ. Electrolytic lesions of the
nucleus accumbens enhance locomotor sensitization
to nicotine in rats. Behavioral neuroscience. 2006
- Koob GF, Stinus L, Le Moal M. Hyperactivity and
hypoactivity produced by lesions to the mesolimbic
dopamine system. Behavioural Brain Research. 1981 Nov
- Sellings LH, Clarke PB. 6-Hydroxydopamine lesions
of nucleus accumbens core abolish amphetamine-induced
conditioned activity. Synapse. 2006 May;59(6):374-7.
- Todtenkopf MS, Carreiras T, Melloni Jr RH, Stellar
JR. The dorsomedial shell of the nucleus accumbens
facilitates cocaine-induced locomotor activity during the
induction of behavioral sensitization. Behavioural Brain
Research. 2002 Apr 11;131(1-2):9-16.
- Weiner I, Gal G, Rawlins JN, Feldon J. Differential
involvement of the shell and core subterritories of the
nucleus accumbens in latent inhibition and amphetamineinduced
activity. Behavioural Brain Research. 1996 Nov
- Garcia-Keller C, Martinez SA, Esparza MA, Bollati
F, Kalivas PW, Cancela LM. Cross-sensitization between
cocaine and acute restraint stress is associated with
sensitized dopamine but not glutamate release in the
nucleus accumbens. European Journal of Neuroscience.
- Shin JH, Adrover MF, Wess J, Alvarez VA. Muscarinic
regulation of dopamine and glutamate transmission in the
nucleus accumbens. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences. 2015 Jun 30;112(26):8124-9.
- Sellings LH, Clarke PB. Segregation of amphetamine
reward and locomotor stimulation between nucleus
accumbens medial shell and core. Journal of Neuroscience.
2003 Jul 16;23(15):6295-303.
- Zahm DS. Functional-anatomical implications of the nucleus accumbens core and shell subterritories. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1999 Jun;877(1):113-28.
- Baracz SJ, Rourke PI, Pardey MC, Hunt GE,
McGregor IS, Cornish JL. Oxytocin directly administered
into the nucleus accumbens core or subthalamic nucleus
attenuates methamphetamine-induced conditioned
place preference. Behavioural Brain Research. 2012 Mar
- Jang JK, Kim WY, Cho BR, Lee JW, Kim JH.
Microinjection of ghrelin in the nucleus accumbens
core enhances locomotor activity induced by cocaine.
Behavioural Brain Research. 2013 Jul 1;248:7-11.
- Hu A, Lai M, Wei J, Wang L, Mao H, Zhou W, et al.
The effect of electroacupuncture on extinction responding
of heroin-seeking behavior and FosB expression in the
nucleus accumbens core. Neuroscience Letters. 2013 Feb
- Waselus M, Flagel SB, Jedynak JP, Akil H, Robinson
TE, Watson Jr SJ. Long-term effects of cocaine experience
on neuroplasticity in the nucleus accumbens core of
addiction-prone rats. Neuroscience. 2013 Sep 17;248:571-
- Feja M, Hayn L, Koch M. Nucleus accumbens core
and shell inactivation differentially affects impulsive
behaviours in rats. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology
and Biological Psychiatry. 2014 Oct 3;54:31-42.
- West EA, Carelli RM. Nucleus accumbens core and
shell differentially encode reward-associated cues after
reinforcer devaluation. Journal of Neuroscience. 2016 Jan
- Yee J, Famous KR, Hopkins TJ, McMullen MC, Pierce
RC, Schmidt HD. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the
nucleus accumbens core and shell contribute to cocaine
priming-induced reinstatement of drug seeking. European
Journal of Pharmacology. 2011 Jan 15;650(2-3):596-604.