Commentary - Journal of Cellular Signaling (2021) Volume 2, Issue 1

S1P Generation by Sphingosine Kinase-2 in Recruited Macrophages Resolves Lung Inflammation by Blocking STING Signaling in Alveolar Macrophages

Jagdish C Joshi^*, Bhagwati Joshi, Ian Rochford, Dolly Mehta

Department of Pharmacology and Center for Lung and Vascular Biology, the University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

*Corresponding Author:

Jagdish C Joshi
E-mail:jcpharm@uic.edu

Received date: October 05, 2020; Accepted date: December 29, 2020

Citation: Joshi JC, Joshi B, Rochford I, Mehta D. S1P Generation by Sphingosine Kinase-2 in Recruited Macrophages Resolves Lung Inflammation by Blocking STING Signaling in Alveolar Macrophages. J Cell Signal 2021; 2(1): 47-51.

Copyright: © 2021 Joshi JC, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the major cause of mortality among hospitalized acute lung injury (ALI) patients. Lung macrophages play an important role in maintaining the tissue-fluid homeostasis following injury. We recently showed that circulating monocytes recruited into the alveolar space suppressed the stimulator of type 1 interferon genes (STING) signaling in alveolar macrophages through sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). We used CD11b-DTR mice to deplete CD11b⁺ monocytes following LPS or Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Depletion of CD11b⁺ monocytes leads to the persistent inflammatory injury, infiltration of neutrophils, activation of STING signaling and mortality following lung infection. We demonstrated that adoptively transferred SPHK₂-CD11b⁺ monocytes into CD11b-DTR mice after pathogenic infection rescue lung inflammatory injury.

Keywords

SPHK₂, Lung injury, Macrophages, STING, ARDS

Author Commentary

Acute lung injury (ALI) is associated with bacterial and viral infection such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, SARSCOV₂ virus, sepsis or drug toxicity which leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), predominantly in elderly patients. ARDS compromises survival of 40% of the patients but the cellular and molecular basis leading to ARDS remains unclear. Macrophages are crucial for a coordinated response to pathogenic insult and to the restoration of tissue homeostasis after triggering inflammatory signaling [1,2]. During any pathogenic infection, macrophages initiate host-defence by generation of pro-inflammatory cytokine and recruitment of neutrophil by activating transcription factor NF-κB via cell-surface toll-like receptor 4 [3,4]. Macrophages also suppress the inflammatory signaling pathway in a time dependent manner which is essential to restore tissue homeostasis. Thus, macrophages play a dual role by both initiating and suppressing inflammatory signaling and reinstating tissue-homeostasis [5,6].

In the lung, two major subsets of macrophages are known to exist; the alveolar macrophages (AMφ), identified by expression of surface markers CD11c⁺/SiglecF⁺, while the other population, known as recruited macrophages originated from monocytes during injury and are identified as being CD11b⁺/SiglecF^- [7-9].

AMφ trigger inflammatory signaling by releasing inflammatory cytokines and recruitment of neutrophils [10-13]. However, protracted inflammatory signaling from AMφ can itself damage vascular barrier function [13,14].

We showed that depletion of the recruited macrophage population, using diphtheria toxin (DT) in DTR-mice, during pathogenic insults induced proliferation and expansion of the inflammatory AMφ in the alveolar space [7]. We have shown that in CD11b⁺ monocytes depleted lungs, AMφ generated markedly higher IL6, IL-1β as well as IFN-β leading to the irreversible loss of lung vascular barrier function and rapid lethality of DTR mice. We demonstrated that, during lung injury, CD11b⁺Mφ alter the alveolar niche to cause AMφ to become anti-inflammatory, thereby preventing sustained inflammatory lung injury [7]. Our study demonstrated that adoptive transfer of CD11b⁺ monocytes from WT murine bone marrow into injured Mφ^dep mice rescued the anti-inflammatory function of AMφ and reversed lung vascular injury. Studies showed that monocytes can differentiate into AMφ [12] and CD11b⁺ CD11c⁺ macrophages in the lung represent a transitional pre-AMφ lineage [15,16]. Thus, an unanswered question is whether recruited CD11b⁺Mφ take on the AMφ signature and function after recruitment into the air space.

Upon sensing pathogens, cytokines released from AMφ can modulate the death of lung parenchymal cells depending on insult and its timing [17,18]. STING is a transmembrane homodimer located in the ER (endoplasmic reticulum) membrane and activated upon binding of the second messenger, cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) [19-21]. DNA liberated upon cell death is sensed by cGAS [22,23], which thereafter converts GMP and AMP into the second messenger cGAMP to activate STING [20]. Upon activation STING translocate to the perinuclear region, Golgi body and binds and phosphorylate to activates TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK₁) and IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3). The phosphorylated IRF3 translocate to the nucleus and induces the generation of Type 1-IFN (Figure 1) [21,24]. We showed that depletion of CD11b⁺Mφ transiently increased cGAMP generation in control lungs while causing persistent increase in cGAMP levels in Mφ^dep lungs, resulting in enhanced STING signaling in these mice [7]. These findings indicate that recruited CD11b⁺Mφ in the airspace tightly control cGAMP-STING signaling in AMφ [7]. Macrophages are plastic in nature and can acquire either an inflammatory or anti-inflammatory phenotype depending on the inflammatory conditions [1]. The adoptive transfer of CD11b monocytes from WT or STING-/- mice into Mφdep mice reversed the AMφ inflammatory signaling. Also, STING null mice failed to exhibit the lung edema and characteristic inflammatory signaling as observed in control mice [7]. However, a caveat of this study was that it did not show the extent to which STING null CD11b⁺ macrophages facilitated anti-inflammatory function of existing AMφ or induce differentiation of CD11b⁺Mφ into AMφ [7].

In searching of the mechanism by which CD11b⁺Mφ suppressed STING signaling in AMφ, we focused on their paracrine role. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) generated by sphingosine kinases (SPHK₁ and SPHK₂) is a wellknown bioactive lipid that protects vascular injury in various murine models of lung injury [25-27]. We showed that SPHK₂ expression was higher in CD11b⁺Mφ than AMφ. Further, we showed that SPHK₂ was required for maintaining SPHK activity and S1P levels in macrophages following LPS injury [7]. Adoptive transfer of WT-CD11b⁺ bone marrow monocytes blocked AMφ STING activity in Mφ depleted mice while transfer of SPHK₂-deficient CD11b⁺ bone marrow monocytes failed to do so. In this case, AMφ remained inflammatory and led to non-resolvable lung injury. We also showed that SPHK₂, but not SPHK₁, was required for LPS stimulated S1P generation and that inhibition of SPHK₂ kinase activity enhanced STING signaling in WT-BMDM as well as human macrophages. AMφ and CD11b⁺Mφ sorted from naïve WT and SPHK₂- null lungs by flow cytometry were also assessed for SPHK₁ and SPHK₂ protein expression and differences in SPHK₂ activity in CD11b⁺Mφ versus AMφ. Interestingly, we found that SPHK₂ activity was 2-fold higher in CD11b⁺Mφ compared to AMφ whereas SPHK₁ was expressed to the same extent in both macrophage subsets. Whereas the SPHK activity and S1P generation in macrophages isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of WT or SPHK₂^-/- mice were significantly reduced after LPS challenge in macrophages during peak of injury [7]. In human macrophages (U937 cell line), inhibition of SPHK₂ activity using specific SPHK₂ inhibitor, ABC294640 [28,29] increased TBK₁, IRF₃ and NF-κB-p65 phosphorylation. These findings suggested that recruited CD11b⁺Mφ functioned in a SPHK₂ dependent manner.

Evidence indicates that activation of plasmalemmal S1P receptors respond to S1P generated by SPHK₁ [25,26,30], whereas SPHK₂-mediated S1P generation regulates cellular functions in a localized manner [31,32]. We showed that SPHK₂ suppressed STING redistribution, indicating compartmentalized action of SPHK₂ in targeting ERSTING signaling [7]. Consistent with this C-terminus of STING to induce STING signaling [33]. To assess S1P interaction with C-terminus of STING we used lysates from HEK cells transducing HA-full-length STING (1-379 aa) or the C-terminus of STING (HA-STING-CTD: aa149-379-STING). While CTD-STING was expressed to a lower extent than FL-STING in HEK, it did interact with S1P. Molecular docking predicted that S1P can competitively inhibit binding of cGAMP to STING C-terminal domain and thereby blocks down stream signaling [7]. However, several questions remain unanswered. First, how SPHK₂ blocked STING translocation to Golgi? We expect that SPHK₂ generated S1P might modulate the STING dimerization and making it unavailable for translocation. Second, what is the affinity of S1P towards STING in absence or presence of cGAMP and what are these binding sites? In order to check the binding affinity of S1P to STING, cGAMP binding and other possible sites in STING could be mutated thereafter its signaling can be assessed following pathogenic insult and/or in the presence of S1P. In addition, it is unclear whether this effect of S1P would be only on CD11b⁺ macrophages, or also in other cell types in the lung. To confirm the action of SPHK₂ generated S1P in other cell type it would be required to perform in vitro studies using specific cell lines or shorted primary cells and targeted delivery of SPHK₂ cDNA in mice following lung injury. How SPHK₂-S1P→STING would be regulated in the context of inflammation? The possibility of the regulation of SPHK₂ activation and generation of S1P following lung infection is depend upon the generation of NF-κB or generation of cGAMP. Answer to all of these questions need critical experiment design and execution in future.

Taken together, our findings suggest that during acute lung injury, CD11b⁺Mφ in the air space can educate AMφ to resolve ALI through suppressing STING signaling. Our study showed that inhibition of SPHK₁ expression in SPHK₂ null BMDM had no effect on STING activity [7].

Our finding also showed that SPHK₂ regulate STING distribution to Golgi body following its activation, while inhibition of SPHK₂ promoted STING interaction with TBK1, leading to its activation. Further studies showed that S1P formed a complex with STING in LPS treated bone-marrow derived macrophages (BMDM). We further showed S1P inhibited cGAMP induced IFN-β production in SPHK₂-null BMDM nearly to the levels of WT-BMDM, indicating SPHK₂-induced S1P binds STING and inhibits cGAMP activation of STING inflammatory signaling [7] (Figure 1). cGAMP interacts with downstream of SPHK₂- mediated S1P generation. These findings could be the basis for future study where SPHK₂ generated S1P in CD11b⁺ macrophages may be a targeted delivery option for the therapeutics of lung inflammatory injury.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL77806, HL060678, HL84153 and HL137179.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors have no conflicting financial interests.

References

1. Wynn TA, Chawla A, Pollard JW. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature. 2013 Apr;496(7446):445-55.
2. Gautier EL, Shay T, Miller J, Greter M, Jakubzick C, Ivanov S, et al. Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages. Nature Immunology. 2012 Nov;13(11):1118-28.
3. Newton K, Dixit VM. Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2012 Mar 1;4(3):a006049.
4. Mogensen TH. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2009 Apr 1;22(2):240-73.
5. Matthay MA, Ware LB, Zimmerman GA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012 Aug 1;122(8):2731-40.
6. Randolph AG. Management of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome in children. Critical Care Medicine. 2009 Aug 1;37(8):2448-54.
7. Joshi JC, Joshi B, Rochford I, Rayees S, Akhter MZ, Baweja S, et al. SPHK2-Generated S1P in CD11b+ Macrophages Blocks STING to Suppress the Inflammatory Function of Alveolar Macrophages. Cell Reports. 2020 Mar 24;30(12):4096-109.
8. Schyns J, Bureau F, Marichal T. Lung interstitial macrophages: past, present, and future. Journal of Immunology Research. 2018 Apr 30;2018.
9. Ward PA. Acute lung injury: how the lung inflammatory response works. Eur Respiratory Soc. 2003.
10. Bosmann M, Grailer JJ, Russkamp NF, Ruemmler R, Zetoune FS, Sarma JV, ET AL. CD11c+ alveolar macrophages are a source of IL-23 during LPSinduced acute lung injury. Shock (Augusta, Ga.). 2013 May;39(5):447.
11. Byrne AJ, Maher TM, Lloyd CM. Pulmonary macrophages: a new therapeutic pathway in fibrosing lung disease?. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2016 Apr 1;22(4):303-16.
12. Westphalen K, Gusarova GA, Islam MN, Subramanian M, Cohen TS, Prince AS, et al. Sessile alveolar macrophages communicate with alveolar epithelium to modulate immunity. Nature. 2014 Feb;506(7489):503-6.
13. Duan M, Li WC, Vlahos R, Maxwell MJ, Anderson GP, Hibbs ML. Distinct macrophage subpopulations characterize acute infection and chronic inflammatory lung disease. The Journal of Immunology. 2012 Jul 15;189(2):946-55.
14. Gibbings SL, Thomas SM, Atif SM, McCubbrey AL, Desch AN, Danhorn T, et al. Three unique interstitial macrophages in the murine lung at steady state. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2017 Jul;57(1):66-76.
15. Schneider C, Nobs SP, Kurrer M, Rehrauer H, Thiele C, Kopf M. Induction of the nuclear receptor PPAR-γ by the cytokine GM-CSF is critical for the differentiation of fetal monocytes into alveolar macrophages. Nature Immunology. 2014 Nov;15(11):1026-37.
16. Makris S, Paulsen M, Johansson C. Type I interferons as regulators of lung inflammation. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017 Mar 10;8:259.
17. Hiruma T, Tsuyuzaki H, Uchida K, Trapnell BC, Yamamura Y, Kusakabe Y, et al. IFN-β improves sepsisrelated alveolar macrophage dysfunction and postseptic acute respiratory distress syndrome–related mortality. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2018 Jul;59(1):45-55.
18. Li X, Shu C, Yi G, Chaton CT, Shelton CL, Diao J, Zuo X, Kao CC, Herr AB, Li P. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is activated by double-stranded DNA-induced oligomerization. Immunity. 2013 Dec 12;39(6):1019-31.
19. Cai X, Chiu YH, Chen ZJ. The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing and signaling. Molecular Cell. 2014 Apr 24;54(2):289-96.
20. Barber GN. STING: infection, inflammation and cancer. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2015 Dec;15(12):760- 70.
21. Burdette DL, Monroe KM, Sotelo-Troha K, Iwig JS, Eckert B, Hyodo M, et al. STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic di-GMP. Nature. 2011 Oct;478(7370):515-8.
22. Ishikawa H, Barber GN. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature. 2008 Oct;455(7213):674-8.
23. Chen Q, Sun L, Chen ZJ. Regulation and function of the cGAS–STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing. Nature immunology. 2016 Oct;17(10):1142-9.
24. Tauseef M, Kini V, Knezevic N, Brannan M, Ramchandaran R, Fyrst H, et al. Activation of sphingosine kinase-1 reverses the increase in lung vascular permeability through sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor signaling in endothelial cells. Circulation research. 2008 Nov 7;103(10):1164-72.
25. Natarajan V, Dudek SM, Jacobson JR, Moreno-Vinasco L, Huang LS, Abassi T, et al. Sphingosine-1–phosphate, FTY720, and Sphingosine-1–phosphate receptors in the pathobiology of acute lung injury. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2013 Jul;49(1):6- 17.
26. Szczepaniak WS, Zhang Y, Hagerty S, Crow MT, Kesari P, Garcia JG, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate rescues canine LPS-induced acute lung injury and alters systemic inflammatory cytokine production in vivo. Translational Research. 2008 Nov 1;152(5):213-24.
27. Xun C, Chen MB, Qi L, Tie-Ning Z, Peng X, Ning L, et al. Targeting sphingosine kinase 2 (SphK2) by ABC294640 inhibits colorectal cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 2015 Dec;34(1):1-9.
28. Xu L, Jin L, Yang B, Wang L, Xia Z, Zhang Q, Xu J. The sphingosine kinase 2 inhibitor ABC294640 inhibits cervical carcinoma cell growth. Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 5;9(2):2384.
29. Spiegel S, Milstien S. The outs and the ins of sphingosine-1-phosphate in immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011 Jun;11(6):403-15.
30. Park K, Elias PM, Shin KO, Lee YM, Hupe M, Borkowski AW, et al. A novel role of a lipid species, sphingosine-1- phosphate, in epithelial innate immunity. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2013 Feb 15;33(4):752-62.
31. Zhang L, Urtz N, Gaertner F, Legate KR, Petzold T, Lorenz M, et al. Sphingosine kinase 2 (Sphk2) regulates platelet biogenesis by providing intracellular sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P). Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 2013 Aug 1;122(5):791-802.
32. Lau L, Gray EE, Brunette RL, Stetson DB. DNA tumor virus oncogenes antagonize the cGAS-STING DNAsensing pathway. Science. 2015 Oct 30;350(6260):568-71.
33. Wu X, Yang J, Na T, Zhang K, Davidoff AM, Yuan BZ, Wang Y. RIG-I and IL-6 are negative-feedback regulators of STING induced by double-stranded DNA. PloS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182961.
34. Li Y, James SJ, Wyllie DH, Wynne C, Czibula A, Bukhari A, et al. TMEM203 is a binding partner and regulator of STING-mediated inflammatory signaling in macrophages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019 Aug 13;116(33):16479-88.

Tweets by Scientific Archives