Commentary - Journal of Clinical Cardiology (2021) Volume 2, Issue 1
Mono- and Multi-nucleated Cardiomyocytes Do Not Constitute Transcriptionally Distinct Entities
Michail Yekelchyk1, Thomas Braun1,2*
1Department of Cardiac Development and Remodeling, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Ludwigstr. 43, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany
2German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Rhein-Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- *Corresponding Author:
- Thomas Braun
Received date: February 11, 2021; Accepted date: March 17, 2021
Citation: Yekelchyk M, Braun T. Mono- and Multi-nucleated Cardiomyocytes Do Not Constitute Transcriptionally Distinct
Entities. J Clin Cardiol. 2021; 2(1):11-14.
Copyright: © 2021 Yekelchyk M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The last years have witnessed an increased interest in the genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional heterogeneity of mammalian hearts under basal and disease conditions. Although it is known for a long time that the heart consists of several, functionally different cell populations, more detailed insights into the potential heterogeneity of individual cell populations, such as cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells or fibroblasts were hindered by the lack of appropriate techniques. The advent of modern single-cell techniques dramatically changed the situation, providing a relatively straightforward way to investigate differences among individual cells on a large scale. Unfortunately, the technical limitations of single-cell techniques have made it difficult to study cardiomyocytes due to their particular morphology and fragility, which prevent the use of standard Droplet-based single cell RNA-sequencing approaches . Hence, most studies resorted to single nucleus RNAsequencing, which provides unprecedented novel insights but falls short to detect potential differences between cells with different numbers of nuclei. In addition, analysis of nuclear RNA might create a bias, ignoring effects of nuclear export, posttranscriptional regulation, etc.
For decades, the differences between cardiomyocytes with different number of nuclei were unknown, giving rise to several speculations. It was assumed that the existence of mono- and multi-nucleated cells might be a mere byproduct of terminal differentiation, while others suggested that mono-nuclear but not multi-nuclear cardiomyocytes contribute to heart regeneration . The
postnatal cardiomyocytes’ nuclearity and nuclei ploidy varies among mammals, ranging from 96% cardiomyocytes
with two nuclei (30-60% of mononucleated cells being
tetraploid) in mice to 90% with one nucleus and 60%
being tetraploid in humans . We recently investigated
potential differences between murine cardiomyocytes
of various nuclearity . Unexpectedly, we found that
mono-, bi-, and multi-nucleated cells were remarkably
similar at the transcriptional level, even after induction of
cardiac hypertrophy, although induction of hypertrophy
led to profound changes in the expression profiles of
individual cardiomyocytes. Transcriptional heterogeneity
in hypertrophic hearts was primarily driven by hypoxic
responses and was associated with expression of the
transcription factor and hypoxia marker HIF1α. Since
expression of HIF1α was inversely correlated with
vascularization of myocardium, we assume that suboptimal
and/or delayed vessel growth during heart remodeling
is the main origin of the observed transcriptional
The finding that rod-shaped cardiomyocytes are strikingly homogeneous is surprising, given the difference in nuclearity. Most cardiomyocytes in the mouse heart undergo karyokinesis but not cytokinesis after birth, which results in the formation of multinucleated cells. Subsequent endoduplication will further increase polyploidy of cardiomyocytes [5,6]. The appearance of more than one nucleus in cardiomyocytes heralds a switch from hyperplasic to hypertrophic growth [3,7,8]. Notably, cardiac interstitial cells also show a varying degree of nuclearity and ploidy . Putative advantages of polyploidization and multi-nucleation are increased resistance to apoptosis, as well as protection of the genome against mutations . Polyploidization might also support
higher metabolic activity, enhance gene expression and
higher efficiency of stress responses, allowing organ growth
without altering cell shape and function. In support of this
notion, it was reported that environmental stress (such
as hypertrophy or injury) during postnatal development
leads to increased multinucleation and polyploidization.
. Some authors even speculated that polyploidization
and/or multi-nucleation might be beneficial in terms of
heart regeneration due to a hypothetical ability of such
cells to divide and potentially superior contraction of larger
cardiomyocytes [12,13]. On the other hand, Gonzalez-Rosa
et al. demonstrated that induction of polyploidization in
zebrafish cardiomyocytes by overexpression of cytokinesis
regulator Ect2 eliminates the ability of heart regeneration
Despite the acclaimed functional differences of mono- and multinucleated cardiomyocytes, virtually no differences were found on the transcriptional level . Both groups of cells expressed a random subset of cell-cycle-related genes, arguing against the hypothesis that either mononuclear or multi-nuclear cardiomyocytes are more prone to enter the cell cycle under basal conditions. Although we observed a clear correlation between nuclearity and cell size, no correlation with the number of sequencing reads per cardiomyocyte was detected, which might imply that increased gene expression is not an inevitable consequence of increased nuclearity. Of course, further studies are required to interrogate this provocative conclusion. Interestingly, a recent study by Windmueller et al.  claimed that mono- and multi-nucleated cardiomyocytes in the mouse are transiently distinct at the transcriptional level until the first week after birth, which coincides with the time window of postnatal murine heart regeneration . In comparison to multi-nucleated cardiomyocytes, mononucleated cardiomyocytes at P7 retained an immature pro-cell-cycle transcriptome, enriched for the targets of E2f transcription factors. Likewise, the transcriptome of multi-nucleated P7 cardiomyocytes was enriched for genes involved in sarcomere organization and showed signs of a transition from oxidative to fatty acid metabolism. These observations may indicate that multi-nucleated cardiomyocytes are more advanced towards maturation at P7 compared to mono-nucleated cells. However, adult cardiomyocytes showed only minor transcriptional differences, which recapitulates our previous findings. Just three genes were differentially expressed between adult mono- and multi-nucleated cardiomyocytes with an FDR <0.05. Two of them (Cenpf, Cyp4b1) were also detected in our dataset, but were not differentially expressed. Only when the authors used uncorrected p-values, accepting lower statistical significance, the number of differentially expressed genes increased (up to 456 DEGs). Based on the observation that these DEGs were enriched in the same gene set enrichment groups as DEGs from P7 cardiomyocytes, they postulated the existence of “remnants of transcriptional differences” in adult cardiomyocytes of different nuclearity. The acceptance of a dramatic decrease in statistical significance, introduced by the replacement of corrected (FDR) to uncorrected p-values, is an arguable and rather bold solution. Standard procedures dictate that detection of differentially expressed genes by RNAseq requires corrected p-values to avoid statistical errors due to multiple testing . Despite these shortcomings,
the expression of genes characteristic for E18.5 fetal
cardiomyocytes in mono- but not multinucleated
cardiomyocytes at P7 is intriguing and supports the
hypothesis that transcriptional divergence between
cardiomyocytes of different nuclearity is a temporal event,
restricted to a rather early time point after birth.
In adult murine heart, however, transcriptional differences between individual cardiomyocytes seem to depend on the local microenvironment rather than on endogenous factors (such as the nuclearity or the nuclear ploidy), which is also supported by a recent report from Litvi?uková et al. . In this impressive study, hearts from adult humans were subjected to single-cell and singlenucleus RNA sequencing analysis, allowing separation of ventricular cardiomyocytes into five interconnected clusters that showed considerable transcriptional overlap. Importantly, the moderate differences between these clusters were primarily attributed to spatial factors (such as association with left or right ventricles, or atrium) but not to the frequency of mono- or multinucleated cardiomyocytes. A similar transcriptional homogeneity of adult cardiomyocytes was observed in recent mouse singlecell and single-nucleus studies by Gladka et al. , the Tabula Muris Consortium  and Vidal and Wagner et al. . Of course, in case of single-nucleus RNA-seq, the information about the nuclearity of original cells is lost. Moreover, the nuclear transcriptome represents a snapshot of currently transcribed genes, which contains un-spliced and immature transcripts, making a direct comparison to the single-cell transcriptome difficult. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that potential heterogeneity of monoversus multi-nucleated cardiomyocytes would have gone unnoticed in single-nucleus datasets: if multi-nucleated cardiomyocytes would have been transcriptionally divergent from mono-nucleated, their nuclei would have clustered separately (assuming low intrinsic variation among nuclei, which belong to the same cell).
Although none of the mentioned studies specifically focused on polyploidization or multi-nucleation, the fact that different clusters of cardiomyocytes did not recapitulate the frequencies of mono-, bi-, or multi-nucleated cells, argues against an important role of cardiomyocyte nuclearity in determining the transcriptional landscape.
Notwithstanding, it is absolutely possible that rod-shaped
cardiomyocytes of different nuclearity differ by other means. For example, they might show different chromatin
organization or display heterogeneity at the proteome level,
which might be caused by differential protein turnover and/
or protein processing . At present, the contribution
of lowly expressed genes to transcriptional heterogeneity
among rod-shaped cardiomyocytes is difficult to access,
since lowly expressed genes are not detected by current
scRNA-seq approaches due to sensitivity limits . We
think that is fair to state that mono- and multi-nucleated
cardiomyocytes show remarkably similar profiles, at least
with respect to abundant gene transcripts, and respond in
a similar manner to disease conditions, such as pressure
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Work in the laboratory of T.B. is supported by the Max Planck Society, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Excellence Cluster Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Transregional Collaborative Research Center TRR81, TP A02, SFB1213 TP B02, TRR 267 TP A05 and the German Center for Cardiovascular Research.
- Lahnemann D, Koster J, Szczurek E, McCarthy DJ,
Hicks SC, Robinson MD, et al. Eleven grand challenges in
single-cell data science. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):31.
- Xin M, Olson EN, Bassel-Duby R. Mending broken
hearts: cardiac development as a basis for adult
heart regeneration and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.
- Landim-Vieira M, Schipper JM, Pinto JR, Chase PB.
Cardiomyocyte nuclearity and ploidy: when is double
trouble? J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2020;41(4):329-40.
- Yekelchyk M, Guenther S, Preussner J, Braun T. Monoand
multi-nucleated ventricular cardiomyocytes constitute
a transcriptionally homogenous cell population. Basic Res
- Elhelaly WM, Lam NT, Hamza M, Xia S, Sadek HA. Redox Regulation of Heart Regeneration: An Evolutionary Tradeoff. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4:137.
- Paradis AN, Gay MS, Zhang L. Binucleation of
cardiomyocytes: the transition from a proliferative to
a terminally differentiated state. Drug Discov Today.
- Soonpaa MH, Kim KK, Pajak L, Franklin M, Field
LJ. Cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis and binucleation
during murine development. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(5 Pt
- Zebrowski DC, Engel FB. The cardiomyocyte cell cycle
in hypertrophy, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration. Rev
Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;165:67-96.
- Broughton KM, Khieu T, Nguyen N, Rosa M, Mohsin
S, Quijada P, et al. Cardiac interstitial tetraploid cells can
escape replicative senescence in rodents but not large
mammals. Commun Biol. 2019;2:205.
- Hassel C, Zhang B, Dixon M, Calvi BR. Induction
of endocycles represses apoptosis independently of
differentiation and predisposes cells to genome instability.
- Orr-Weaver TL. When bigger is better: the
role of polyploidy in organogenesis. Trends Genet.
- Broughton KM, Sussman MA. Myocardial Regeneration
for Humans- Modifying Biology and Manipulating
Evolution. Circ J. 2017;81(2):142-8.
- Leone M, Engel FB. Advances in heart regeneration
based on cardiomyocyte proliferation and regenerative
potential of binucleated cardiomyocytes and
polyploidization. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019;133(11):1229-53.
- Gonzalez-Rosa JM, Sharpe M, Field D, Soonpaa MH,
Field LJ, Burns CE, et al. Myocardial Polyploidization
Creates a Barrier to Heart Regeneration in Zebrafish. Dev
- Windmueller R, Leach JP, Babu A, Zhou S, Morley
MP, Wakabayashi A, et al. Direct Comparison of
Mononucleated and Binucleated Cardiomyocytes Reveals
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Distinct Proliferative
Competencies. Cell Rep. 2020;30(9):3105-16.e4.
- Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA,
Richardson JA, Olson EN, et al. Transient regenerative
potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science.
- Li J, Witten DM, Johnstone IM, Tibshirani R.
Normalization, testing, and false discovery rate estimation
for RNA-sequencing data. Biostatistics. 2012;13(3):523-
- Litvinukova M, Talavera-Lopez C, Maatz H, Reichart
D, Worth CL, Lindberg EL, et al. Cells of the adult human
heart. Nature. 2020;588(7838):466-72.
- Gladka MM, Molenaar B, de Ruiter H, van der Elst
S, Tsui H, Versteeg D, et al. Single-Cell Sequencing of
the Healthy and Diseased Heart Reveals Cytoskeleton-
Associated Protein 4 as a New Modulator of Fibroblasts
Activation. Circulation. 2018;138(2):166-80.
- Tabula Muris C, Overall c, Logistical c, Organ c,
processing, Library p, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics
of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature.
- Vidal R, Wagner JUG, Braeuning C, Fischer C, Patrick
R, Tombor L, et al. Transcriptional heterogeneity of
fibroblasts is a hallmark of the aging heart. JCI Insight.
- Claydon AJ, Beynon R. Proteome dynamics: revisiting
turnover with a global perspective. Mol Cell Proteomics.
- Qiu P. Embracing the dropouts in single-cell RNA-seq
analysis. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1169.