Loading

Commentary Open Access
Volume 6 | Issue 3 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.33696/Signaling.6.141

CRABP1 Signalosomes in Cellular Stress Response and Health Maintenance

  • 1Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
+ Affiliations - Affiliations

*Corresponding Author

Li-Na Wei, weixx009@umn.edu

Received Date: August 20, 2025

Accepted Date: September 13, 2025

Keywords

Cell signaling pathways, Molecular signaling, Stress response

Introduction

CRABP1 is an evolutionarily conserved retinoic acid (RA) binding protein that was originally characterized to bind and sequester cytosolic RA [1,2]. Classical RA signaling involves RA binding to nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs) to regulate gene transcription [3]. However, recent studies have established that CRABP1 in fact forms protein complexes, with or without RA, in the cytoplasm to modulate (mostly suppress) specific signaling pathways in a cell context-dependent manner. These CRABP1-complexes are named “CRABP1-signalosomes”. RA binding to CRABP1 (holo-CRABP1) is known to enhance the formation of these signalosomes, and therefore, RA can enhance the modulatory effects of CRABP1 signalosomes [1,4–6]. As such, CRABP1 signalosomes provide a novel mechanism to modulate specific cell signaling pathways to affect cellular health and functions even without RA. Whereas in the presence of RA, the modulatory (suppressive) effects of CRABP1 signalosomes are enhanced in a RA dose-dependent manner. Molecular, cellular, and structural studies validated the existence of at least two CRABP1-signalosomes that modulate the health of various organ systems, which are the CRABP1-mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalosome [5] and CRABP1-Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) signalosome [7]. The physiological roles of these two CRABP1 signalosomes were revealed in studies of the Crabp1 knockout (CKO) mouse model, including modulating neural stem cell pools [8], cardiac protection from beta-adrenergic insult [6,9], protection from high fat diet induced obesity [10], regulating exosome [11,12] and adipokine secretion [13], maintaining motor neuron (MN) [14] and thyrocyte health [15], and modulating MN’s stress response [16]. As such, we propose CRABP1 signalosomes as important players in maintaining systemic homeostasis and reducing disease vulnerability. Here, we discuss and speculate on additional CRABP1 signalosomes identified recently, particularly those pertinent to cellular stress responses. Additionally, from our recent exploitation of human bioinformatics [13], we highlight the valuable translational application of targeting specific CRABP1 signalosomes in disease prevention and/or developing therapeutics that modulate the cellular stress response.

The cellular stress response is a coordinated process in response to environmental stressors to protect and maintain the integrity of the cell. The accumulation of unfolded proteins in particular can induce a variety of deleterious consequences such as increased protein aggregation, organelle dysfunction, and oxidative stress, etc. [17]. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an organelle-specific and highly conserved stress response that can occur in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [18] and mitochondria [19]. The ER-UPR is executed through three major pathways mediated by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α), activating transcription factor-6 (ATF6), and inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (IRE1α). eIF2α is activated by the upstream eIF2α kinases, protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase (PERK), general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2), and heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI), which, in response to specific stressors, phosphorylate eIF2α to halt global translation thereby reducing protein load. ATF6 is a membrane-bound transcription factor that, upon ER stress, is transported to the Golgi for proteolytic cleavage to release its cytosolic domain, which then enters the nucleus to induce the expression of genes involved in protein folding, ER-associated degradation (ERAD), and lipid synthesis. IRE1α, the most evolutionarily conserved member, is a sensor for ER stress that acts by splicing XBP1, a transcription factor that induces the expression of various stress response genes such as chaperones to expand the functional capacity of the ER. The mitochondrial UPR (mt-UPR) response is mainly mediated by phosphorylated eIF2α which induces the translation of transcription factors C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), and activating transcription factor 5 (ATF5) to promote mitochondrial proteostasis by enhancing molecular chaperone activity and protein degradation processes [19].

CRABP1 Signalosomes in Stress Response

Our study showed that depleting CRABP1 in MNs caused mitochondrial defects manifested as reduced mitochondrial DNA content and impaired metabolism [16]. Furthermore, CKO MNs had defects in antioxidant signaling pathways and mt-UPR. The failure to engage mt-UPR in CKO MNs was attributed to reduced phosphorylation of eIF2α [16]. Thus, losing CRABP1 in MNs could result in a reduced capacity to engage mitochondrial stress response, and consequentially, failure to remove reactive oxygen species (ROS) and unfolded proteins. Our recent proteomic studies [11] and molecular experiments to identify protein complexes (JN, unpublished) found that eIF2α forms a protein complex with CRABP1, suggesting the existence of a CRABP1–eIF2α signalosome in MNs. Additional studies revealed CRABP1 interacting with IRE1α in thyrocytes to modulate IRE1α phosphorylation and clustering, suggesting the existence of a CRABP1-IRE1α signalosome in thyrocytes (FN, unpublished).

These observations further expand the repertoire of cell context-dependent CRABP1 signalosomes. Of particular significance is the physiological role of CRABP1 signalosomes in certain highly specialized and vulnerable cell types. For instance, MNs are most vulnerable to excitotoxic insults because of their high-demand activities which require proper and timely stress responses to maintain protein homeostasis, prevent oxidative damage, and support mitochondrial function [20]. Thyrocytes have a high demand for ER-related functions given their need for expressing large amounts of thyroglobulin, a large protein that requires extensive post-translational modifications for the synthesis of thyroid hormones [21]. Thus, thyrocytes especially require protection against unfolded protein accumulation and stressors associated with secretion [21]. Importantly, CRABP1 is highly expressed in both MNs and thyrocytes, presumably because of their needs for CRABP1-signalosomes to effectively engage their stress responses and maintain health.

CRABP1 Gene Expression in Human Health and Disease

The highly conserved functions of CRABP1 signalosomes are consistent with the tight regulation of CRABP1 gene expression. The mouse Crabp1 gene is known to be stringently regulated, which involves specific epigenetic and physiological factors [22]. Aberrant expression or depletion of Crabp1 negatively affects cellular health and organismal fitness [23–28]. This is supported by the various disease phenotypes revealed in CKO mice, as well as several human diseases where CRABP1 expression was found to be significantly down-regulated [1]. Presumably, strict regulation of CRABP1 gene provides a means to regulate/safe-guard the formation and “dose” of CRABP1-signalosomes. Changes (increases) in CRABP1 expression may reflect a cell’s need for stronger stress response–related activities. This could be translationally useful in a clinical setting, such as indicating the overall health of certain cell populations and tissue types. Therefore, in certain vulnerable cell populations, proper expression of CRABP1 would serve as a unique marker of cytoprotection; whereas its depletion would indicate increased disease vulnerability.

Translational Applications and Conclusion

In the clinic, RA is used as a highly efficacious therapeutic agent for rare leukemias and dermatological disorders [29,30]. However, RA is known to cause toxic side-effects such as teratogenicity and differentiation syndrome, both of which are mediated by RARs [31–33]. Therefore, in translational applications of RA, RAR-associated retinoid toxicities are of primary concern. Given the documented proof-of-principle that CRABP1-selective ligands can be designed to target specific signaling pathways [5,34,35], the translational value of targeting CRABP1-signalosomes cannot be ignored. To this end, CRABP1 signalosomes provide pharmacological targets in diseases such as neurodegeneration, thyroid dysfunction, heart failure, obesity and immune functions. Therefore, in translational applications, CRABP1-selective (without acting on RARs) ligands can be applied to enhance the modulatory effects of CRABP1 signalosomes without eliciting retinoid toxicity. Furthermore, CRABP1-selective ligands can be designed to target (bias) signaling toward particular pathways active only in certain cell populations, enabling modulation of only disease-relevant pathways in specific cell types of interest, thus further reducing the likelihood of toxicities. With regards to newly uncovered CRABP1-eIF2a and -IRE1a signalosomes that modulate stress response, future studies are needed to elucidate their mechanisms of action and to identify/synthesize specific ligands to exploit their translational potential, such as to enhance cellular stress response and maintain the health of various cell types.

Author Contributions Statement

J.N., F.N. and L.-N.W.: Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing; L.-N.W.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grants R01NS132277 (DK54733), as well as the Dean’s Commitment of U Minnesota to LNW.

Acknowledgements

None.

References

1. Nhieu J, Lin YL, Wei LN. CRABP1 in Non-Canonical Activities of Retinoic Acid in Health and Diseases. Nutrients. 2022 Apr 6;14(7):1528.

2. Napoli JL. Cellular retinoid binding-proteins, CRBP, CRABP, FABP5: Effects on retinoid metabolism, function and related diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2017 May;173:19–33.

3. Cunningham TJ, Duester G. Mechanisms of retinoic acid signalling and its roles in organ and limb development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Feb;16(2):110–23.

4. Nagpal I, Wei LN. All-trans retinoic acid as a versatile cytosolic signal modulator mediated by CRABP1. Int J Mol Sci.2019 Jul 24;20(15):3610.

5. Park SW, Nhieu J, Persaud SD, Miller MC, Xia Y, Lin YW, et al. A new regulatory mechanism for Raf kinase activation, retinoic acid-bound Crabp1. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10929.

6. Park SW, Nhieu J, Lin YW, Wei LN. All-trans retinoic acid attenuates isoproterenol-induced cardiac dysfunction through Crabp1 to dampen CaMKII activation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 5;858:172485.

7. Nhieu J, Miller MC, Lerdall TA, Mayo KH, Wei LN. Molecular basis for cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 1 in modulating CaMKII activation. Front Mol Biosci. 2023 Sep 26;10:1268843.

8. Lin YL, Persaud SD, Nhieu J, Wei LN. Cellular Retinoic Acid-Binding Protein 1 Modulates Stem Cell Proliferation to Affect Learning and Memory in Male Mice. Endocrinology. 2017 Sep 1;158(9):3004–14.

9. Park SW, Persaud SD, Ogokeh S, Meyers TA, Townsend D, Wei LN. CRABP1 protects the heart from isoproterenol-induced acute and chronic remodeling. J Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;236(3):151–65.

10. Lin YW, Park SW, Lin YL, Burton FH, Wei LN. Cellular retinoic acid binding protein 1 protects mice from high-fat diet-induced obesity by decreasing adipocyte hypertrophy. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 Feb;44(2):466–74.

11. Nhieu J, Wei CW, Ludwig M, Drake JM, Wei LN. CRABP1-complexes in exosome secretion. Cell Commun Signal. 2024 Jul 29;22(1):381.

12. Lin YW, Nhieu J, Wei CW, Lin YL, Kagechika H, Wei LN. Regulation of exosome secretion by cellular retinoic acid binding protein 1 contributes to systemic anti-inflammation. Cell Commun Signal. 2021 Jun 30;19(1):69.

13. Wei CW, Nhieu J, Lin YL, Wei LN. Modulation of adipose inflammation by cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022 Oct;46(10):1759–69.

14. Lin YL, Nhieu J, Liu PY, Le G, Lee DJ, Wei CW, et al. CRABP1-CaMKII-Agrn regulates the maintenance of neuromuscular junction in spinal motor neuron. Cell Death Differ. 2022 Sep;29(9):1744–56.

15. Najjar F, Nhieu J, Wei CW, Milbauer L, Burmeister L, Seelig D, et al. Deleting Cellular retinoic-acid-binding Protein-1 (Crabp1) gene causes adult-onset primary hypothyroidism in mice. Endocrines. 2023 Mar 2;4(1):138–50.

16. Wei CW, Lerdall T, Najjar F, Wei LN. Depleting Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein 1 Impairs UPRmt. J Cell Signal. 2023;4(4):151–62.

17. Kültz D. Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response. Annu Rev Physiol. 2005;67:225–57.

18. Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ. Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020 Aug;21(8):421–38.

19. Shpilka T, Haynes CM. The mitochondrial UPR: mechanisms, physiological functions and implications in ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018 Feb;19(2):109–20.

20. Yadav A, Matson KJE, Li L, Hua I, Petrescu J, Kang K, et al. A cellular taxonomy of the adult human spinal cord. Neuron. 2023 Feb 1;111(3):328–44.e7.

21. Di Jeso B, Arvan P. Thyroglobulin From Molecular and Cellular Biology to Clinical Endocrinology. Endocr Rev. 2016 Feb;37(1):2–36.

22. Wei LN. Non-canonical activity of retinoic acid in epigenetic control of embryonic stem cell. Transcription. 2013 Jul-Aug;4(4):158–61.

23. Wei LN, Lee CH. Demethylation in the 5'-flanking region of mouse cellular retinoic acid binding protein-I gene is associated with its high level of expression in mouse embryos and facilitates its induction by retinoic acid in P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Dev Dyn. 1994 Sep;201(1):1–10.

24. Wei LN, Chen GJ, Chu YS, Tsao JL, Nguyen-Huu MC. A 3 kb sequence from the mouse cellular retinoic-acid-binding protein gene upstream region mediates spatial and temporal LacZ expression in transgenic mouse embryos. Development. 1991 Jul;112(3):847–54.

25. Wei LN. Chromatin remodeling and epigenetic regulation of the CrabpI gene in adipocyte differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Jan;1821(1):206–12.

26. Wei LN. Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Proteins: Genomic and Non-genomic Functions and their Regulation. Subcell Biochem. 2016;81:163–78.

27. Park SW, Li G, Lin YP, Barrero MJ, Ge K, Roeder RG, et al. Thyroid hormone-induced juxtaposition of regulatory elements/factors and chromatin remodeling of Crabp1 dependent on MED1/TRAP220. Mol Cell. 2005 Sep 2;19(5):643–53.

28. Park SW, Huang WH, Persaud SD, Wei LN. RIP140 in thyroid hormone-repression and chromatin remodeling of Crabp1 gene during adipocyte differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Nov;37(21):7085–94.

29. Sanz MA, Grimwade D, Tallman MS, Lowenberg B, Fenaux P, Estey EH, et al. Management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2009 Feb 26;113(9):1875–91.

30. Orfanos CE, Zouboulis CC, Almond-Roesler B, Geilen CC. Current use and future potential role of retinoids in dermatology. Drugs. 1997 Mar;53(3):358–88.

31. Williams AL, Pace ND, DeSesso JM. Teratogen update: Topical use and third-generation retinoids. Birth Defects Res. 2020 Sep;112(15):1105–14.

32. Lammer EJ, Chen DT, Hoar RM, Agnish ND, Benke PJ, Braun JT, et al. Retinoic acid embryopathy. N Engl J Med. 1985 Oct 3;313(14):837–41.

33. Montesinos P, Sanz MA. The differentiation syndrome in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: experience of the pethema group and review of the literature. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2011;3(1):e2011059.

34. Persaud SD, Park SW, Ishigami-Yuasa M, Koyano-Nakagawa N, Kagechika H, Wei LN. All trans-retinoic acid analogs promote cancer cell apoptosis through non-genomic Crabp1 mediating ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 3;6:22396.

35. Nhieu J, Milbauer L, Lerdall T, Najjar F, Wei CW, Ishida R, et al. Targeting Cellular Retinoic Acid Binding Protein 1 with Retinoic Acid-like Compounds to Mitigate Motor Neuron Degeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 4;24(5):4980.

Author Information X