Keywords
Bioelectricity, Brain development, Neural stem cells
Editorial
Neural stem cells (NSCs) are the foundation of brain development, giving rise to the vast diversity of neurons and glial cells that form the central nervous system. In the embryonic cerebral cortex, radial glia arise from primitive neuroepithelium and act as the main source of NSCs and progenitors of other glial cells that balance self-renewal with differentiation in a spatially and temporally regulated manner [1,2]. Neural stem and progenitor cells can also be found in the neural crest during development, the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus in the hippocampus, and subventricular zone (SVZ) of the lateral ventricles in the adult brain [3,4]. The precise orchestration of NSC lineage progression underlies the layered architecture of the cerebral cortex and the functional connectivity of the adult brain [5,6]. Dysregulation in NSC behavior can result in developmental abnormalities, impaired cognition, or predisposition to disease [7].
While transcriptional and epigenetic regulations at the chromatin level have been extensively studied during neural development, emerging evidence highlights a renewed interest in bioelectricity, one of the most basic and intrinsic properties of cells, as a key layer of control influencing NSC proliferation and differentiation [8,9]. Bioelectricity is fundamental to all cell types and established through the differential distribution of ions and charged particles across the plasma membrane by the modulation of expression and activity of ion channels, transporters, gap junctions, and pumps [9]. Nearly all animal cells maintain a conserved ionic asymmetry, where intracellular potassium ion (K+) concentration is higher and sodium ion (Na+) level is lower compared to the extracellular environment. This gradient is upheld by the Na+/K+-ATPase ion pump and underlies critical functions such as cellular volume regulation [10]. The resting membrane potential reflects a balanced state of ions, chemicals, and charged molecules between the extracellular and intracellular spaces and contributes to each cell type’s unique physiology [9].
Gap junctions (GJs) are formed by direct docking of two GJ hemichannels, with 6 connexin or pannexin isoforms on each apposing side, between adjacent cells or cell-cell contact sites [11]. GJs are multifaceted mediators on the plasma membrane capable of coordinating rapid electric and chemical coupling of a large group of cells through GJ formation. They can also perform GJ-independent functions as hemichannels, adhesion molecules, and modulators of intracellular signaling pathways [12]. Studies have found that GJ subunits are widely expressed in the developing brain and participate in neurogenesis, migration of postmitotic cells, and chemical synapse formation [13]. Connexin 43 (Cx43) has been shown to regulate the fate of human neural progenitor cells (hNPCs) [14]. Silencing of Cx43 shifts their differentiation balance, promoting a neuronal phenotype while reducing a glial phenotype, through GJ-independent and β-catenin-mediated transcription of pro-neuronal genes. Notably, studies in an E16-17 rat model reveal that Cx43 hemichannels serve as key initiators of radial glial calcium waves, and that disruption of this activity compromises neurogenesis in the ventricular zone [15]. Similar findings have been observed in mouse embryonic stem cell–derived neural progenitors, where connexin 43-mediated electrical coupling drives the activation of voltage-gated Ca²+ channels, which in turn leads to the generation of Ca²+ oscillations, ultimately enhancing progenitor proliferation and contributing to cortical layer development [16]. It was also reported that GJ communication mediated by Cx43 and Cx45 in rat fetal (E10.5) NSCs is essential for their survival and proliferation [17]. Taken together, these studies underscore critical roles of GJs in shaping cortical development [18].
Various ion channels have also been reported during the proliferation and/or differentiation of neural stem and progenitor cells. Emerging evidence indicates that hNPCs derived from fetal midbrain progressively acquire functional voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels as they mature into neurons in vitro, which are essential for the generation of action potentials, while proliferating hNPCs engage transient receptor potential (TRP) channel-mediated calcium entry during neurogenesis [19,20]. Notably, store-operated calcium ion influx mediated by calcium release-activated channel (CRAC) also plays important roles in embryonic and adult NPC proliferation in vitro and in vivo [21]. In glial progenitor cells, blockage of K+ channel activity resulted in accumulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p27(Kip1) and p21(CIP1), and cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase, linking electrical states to cell cycle progression [22]. In the postnatal and adult mouse hippocampal dentate gyrus, the Na+-K+-2Cl- (NKCC1) cotransporter is a central regulator of chloride homeostasis that preserves neural stem cell quiescence, thereby ensuring life-long neurogenesis [23]. Moreover, Piezos are mechanically activated and nonselective cation channels localized on the plasma membrane [24]. They convert mechanical forces such as stretch, stiffness, and shear into lineage cues via integrin, ERK1/2 MAPK, Notch, and WNT pathways, linking extracellular mechanics to stem cell fate [25]. In E10.5 mouse embryos, Piezo1 regulates neural stem cell proliferation, differentiation, and cholesterol metabolism [26], while in traumatic brain injury models, its inhibition directs the differentiation of hippocampal NSCs toward neurons [27]. Extending this biology into biomaterials, human neural stem and progenitors cultured on piezoelectric scaffolds differentiated into β-III tubulin-positive neuronal cells even without inductive factors [28]. Together, these findings highlight Piezo1 as a hub of mechano-bioelectric regulation and underscore piezoelectric materials as powerful tools for neural tissue engineering.
Lastly, electrical stimulation has been shown to drive embryonic stem cells toward neuronal lineages through calcium-dependent mechanisms and to increase fetal NSC proliferation and differentiation [29,30]. These findings suggest that incorporating electrical modulation into pluripotent stem cell-based brain organoids could provide an exciting opportunity to enhance their developmental precision and functional relevance. Key challenges include capturing the dynamics of membrane potentials at single-cell resolution and clarifying how bioelectric signals interface with cell-cell/cell-extracellular matrix interactions, intracellular signaling, transcriptional regulation, and chromatin regulators. Innovative tools such as optogenetics, piezoelectric biomaterials, and nanotechnology-based voltage modulators hold promise for experimental dissection and therapeutic translation. Collectively, these advances position bioelectricity as a frontier in developmental neurobiology with the potential to redefine models of brain development and open new avenues for regenerative medicine.
References
2. Farkas LM, Huttner WB. The cell biology of neural stem and progenitor cells and its significance for their proliferation versus differentiation during mammalian brain development. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008 Dec;20(6):707–15.
3. Ming GL, Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron. 2011 May 26;70(4):687–702.
4. Zhao C, Deng W, Gage FH. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell. 2008 Feb 22;132(4):645–60.
5. Noctor SC, Flint AC, Weissman TA, Dammerman RS, Kriegstein AR. Neurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex. Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):714–20.
6. Gage FH, Temple S. Neural stem cells: generating and regenerating the brain. Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):588–601.
7. Ladran I, Tran N, Topol A, Brennand KJ. Neural stem and progenitor cells in health and disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;5(6):701–15.
8. Levin M. Bioelectric signaling: Reprogrammable circuits underlying embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer. Cell. 2021 Apr 15;184(8):1971–89.
9. Zhang G, Levin M. Bioelectricity is a universal multifaced signaling cue in living organisms. Mol Biol Cell. 2025 Feb 1;36(2):pe2.
10. Pivovarov AS, Calahorro F, Walker RJ. Na+/K+-pump and neurotransmitter membrane receptors. Invert Neurosci. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):1.
11. Evans WH, Martin PE. Gap junctions: structure and function (Review). Mol Membr Biol. 2002 Apr-Jun;19(2):121–36.
12. Levin M. Gap junctional communication in morphogenesis. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007 May-Jun;94(1-2):186–206.
13. Cao JW, Liu LY, Yu YC. Gap junctions regulate the development of neural circuits in the neocortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2023 Aug;81:102735.
14. Rinaldi F, Hartfield EM, Crompton LA, Badger JL, Glover CP, Kelly CM, et al. Cross-regulation of Connexin43 and β-catenin influences differentiation of human neural progenitor cells. Cell Death Dis. 2014 Jan 23;5(1):e1017.
15. Weissman TA, Riquelme PA, Ivic L, Flint AC, Kriegstein AR. Calcium waves propagate through radial glial cells and modulate proliferation in the developing neocortex. Neuron. 2004 Sep 2;43(5):647–61.
16. Malmersjö S, Rebellato P, Smedler E, Planert H, Kanatani S, Liste I, et al. Neural progenitors organize in small-world networks to promote cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):E1524–32.
17. Cai J, Cheng A, Luo Y, Lu C, Mattson MP, Rao MS, et al. Membrane properties of rat embryonic multipotent neural stem cells. J Neurochem. 2004 Jan;88(1):212–26.
18. Elias LA, Kriegstein AR. Gap junctions: multifaceted regulators of embryonic cortical development. Trends Neurosci. 2008 May;31(5):243–50.
19. Stanslowsky N, Tharmarasa S, Staege S, Kalmbach N, Klietz M, Schwarz SC, et al. Calcium, Sodium, and Transient Receptor Potential Channel Expression in Human Fetal Midbrain-Derived Neural Progenitor Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2018 Jul 15;27(14):976–84.
20. Morgan PJ, Hübner R, Rolfs A, Frech MJ. Spontaneous calcium transients in human neural progenitor cells mediated by transient receptor potential channels. Stem Cells Dev. 2013 Sep 15;22(18):2477–86.
21. Somasundaram A, Shum AK, McBride HJ, Kessler JA, Feske S, Miller RJ, et al. Store-operated CRAC channels regulate gene expression and proliferation in neural progenitor cells. J Neurosci. 2014 Jul 2;34(27):9107–23.
22. Ghiani CA, Yuan X, Eisen AM, Knutson PL, DePinho RA, McBain CJ, et al. Voltage-activated K+ channels and membrane depolarization regulate accumulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27(Kip1) and p21(CIP1) in glial progenitor cells. J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 1;19(13):5380–92.
23. Zhang F, Yoon K, Kim NS, Ming GL, Song H. Cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous roles of NKCC1 in regulating neural stem cell quiescence in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. Stem Cell Reports. 2023 Jul 11;18(7):1468–81.
24. Nosyreva ED, Thompson D, Syeda R. Identification and functional characterization of the Piezo1 channel pore domain. J Biol Chem. 2021 Jan-Jun;296:100225.
25. Qiu X, Deng Z, Wang M, Feng Y, Bi L, Li L. Piezo protein determines stem cell fate by transmitting mechanical signals. Hum Cell. 2023 Mar;36(2):540–53.
26. Nourse JL, Leung VM, Abuwarda H, Evans EL, Izquierdo-Ortiz E, Ly AT, et al. Piezo1 regulates cholesterol biosynthesis to influence neural stem cell fate during brain development. J Gen Physiol. 2022 Oct 3;154(10):e202213084.
27. Mocciaro E, Kidd M, Johnson K, Bishop E, Johnson K, Zeng YP, et al. Mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 modulates the response of rat hippocampus neural stem cells to rapid stretch injury. PLoS One. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323191.
28. Lee YS, Arinzeh TL. The influence of piezoelectric scaffolds on neural differentiation of human neural stem/progenitor cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012 Oct;18(19-20):2063–72.
29. O'Hara-Wright M, Mobini S, Gonzalez-Cordero A. Bioelectric Potential in Next-Generation Organoids: Electrical Stimulation to Enhance 3D Structures of the Central Nervous System. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 May 17;10:901652.
30. Yamada M, Tanemura K, Okada S, Iwanami A, Nakamura M, Mizuno H, et al. Electrical stimulation modulates fate determination of differentiating embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007 Mar;25(3):562–70.