Introduction
We have published an article in Trials journal to carry out a multicentered, randomized controlled clinical trial on the treatment role of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) combined Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) step-down in non-erosive reflux disease (NRED) [1]. NRED is the most popular type of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which is defined as “the presence of abnormal acid exposure time (AET) with or without reflux–symptom association on ambulatory reflux monitoring performed off anti-secretory therapy” by Rome IV consensus [2]. PPIs are the most effective strategies for NERD, however, about 50% of the NRED patients do not respond to the standard PPI dose and two-thirds of NERD patients have a recurrence of symptoms after stopping the PPI medication [3-5]. Besides, the usage of PPIs has been proven in relation to different kinds of diseases including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and bacterial enteric infections [6]. Complementary and alternative approaches have been suggested for effective treatment of NERD [7,8]. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is one of the methods useful in NERD intervention which has been used in China for many years in NERD treatment. Lots of studies have proved that TCM has beneficial therapeutic effects in NERD [8-10]. It is a well-known adage from medical practice: “All drugs should be given in the lowest effective dose and for the shortest possible time.” However, a sudden stop of PPIs will cause physiological acid rebound and repeated symptoms, resulting in unsuccessful drug withdrawal. Therefore, our research first put forward an innovative kind of tactic that TCM helps to reduce the gradient of PPIs and relieve the patient's symptoms.
TCM treated patients according to a complex network analysis based on the criterion that doctors make a diagnosis after a comprehensive assessment of the patient’s symptoms, tongue, and pulse [11]. In our previous research, 6 hospitals from different provinces of China divided participants into three groups according to their different TCM syndromes which conforms to the basic criteria of TCM treatment [1]. Confirm the clinical research reporting standards: administrating treatment according to pattern differentiation [12]. The evidence-based medicine (EBM) has changed the concepts and the way of clinical decision-making since the 1990s, TCM researchers have worked on how to use the evidence to support decision-making [13,14]. There are four elements in a clinical question, participants (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcomes (O) [15]. In the research, patients’ selection criteria for NERD were made according to the China Consensus Opinion on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. The treatment history, compliance, and security strict adherence to the research standards [16]. Participants with the same TCM syndrome will be separated into the intervention group and the control group at a ratio of 1:1 [1]. The preparation of placebos used in the trial was made in a dosage form similar to that of the testing drug as possible [17,18] to reduce intervention bias. TCM physicians from different hospitals received professional training. Besides, different groups of patients are distinguished, and more personalized schemes are formulated.
In clinical research, blinding is necessary for human behavior to be influenced by what we know or believe [19]. The blinding in controlled trials, and particularly “double-blind,” usually refers to keeping participants, those involved with management, and those collecting and analyzing data unaware of the treatment assignment, so that they would not be influenced by what they know, avoiding overestimating the test results [20-22]. In the trial, we followed the requirements strictly according to the established SOP guidelines. All codes were kept in the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Centre of Xiyuan Hospital [1]. Besides, the protocol received approval from the Ethical Review Committee Auditing and written informed consent forms were provided for eligible participants. The above design enhances the reliability of the results.
During the treatment of NERD, interventions should satisfy psychosocial and physical aspects related to the disease process. In the previous clinical trial, both the visual analog scale (VAS) for heartburn along with regurgitation and the major symptoms scale were used as the primary outcomes [1]. VAS has been used for decades to evaluate the effects of various therapies for its ability to detect minute changes. VAS makes it easy for any cognitive participants to understand the parameters and respond to clinician instructions [23]. However, different candidates have different perceptions of feelings, VAS threshold, and the subjective distinction between what they deem simply an unpleasant sensation versus clinically relevant feelings [23]. The secondary outcomes including PPI withdrawal rate and symptoms recurrence rate, scales about minor symptoms, health-related quality of life, mental health, and TCM syndromes help us avoid the above distractions.
PPIs are widely used in upper gastrointestinal disease treatments characterized by excessive acid production. PPIs have a side effect, prescribers should evaluate every patient and prescribe the shortest PPIs period [24]. There are two weeks of acid reflux after stopping PPI treatment, which affects about 44% of the volunteers [25]. Slowly decreasing the dose of PPIs in two or four weeks shows the reduction of rebound symptoms risk [26]. The combination of TCM and PPI application can improve other related symptoms when improving the efficacy, and it is not easy to bounce back and have small side effects.
References
2. Aziz Q, Fass R, Gyawali CP, Miwa H, Pandolfino JE, Zerbib F. Functional Esophageal Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 15:S0016-5085(16)00178-5.
3. Tominaga K, Kato M, Takeda H, Shimoyama Y, Umegaki E, Iwakiri R, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of rikkunshito for patients with non-erosive reflux disease refractory to proton-pump inhibitor: the G-PRIDE study. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(10):1392-405.
4. Hoshikawa Y, Kawami N, Hoshino S, Tanabe T, Umezawa M, Kaise M, et al. Efficacy of on-demand therapy using 20-mg vonoprazan for non-erosive reflux disease. Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society. 2019;16(2):201-6.
5. Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E, Zerbib F, Mion F, Smout AJPM, et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351-62.
6. Vaezi MF, Yang YX, Howden CW. Complications of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jul;153(1):35-48.
7. Salehi M, Karegar-Borzi H, Karimi M, Rahimi R. Medicinal Plants for Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review of Animal and Human Studies. J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Feb;23(2):82-95.
8. Zhang J, Che H, Zhang B, Zhang C, Zhou B, Ji H, et al. JianpiQinghua granule reduced PPI dosage in patients with nonerosive reflux disease: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority study. Phytomedicine. 2021 Jul 15;88:153584.
9. Karkon Varnosfaderani S, Hashem-Dabaghian F, Amin G, Bozorgi M, Heydarirad G, Nazem E, et al. Efficacy and safety of Amla (Phyllanthus emblica L.) in non-erosive reflux disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Integr Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):126-31.
10. Tominaga K, Iwakiri R, Fujimoto K, Fujiwara Y, Tanaka M, Shimoyama Y, et al. Rikkunshito improves symptoms in PPI-refractory GERD patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;47(3):284-92.
11. Tian G, Zhao C, Zhang X, Mu W, Jiang Y, Wei X, et al. Evidence-based traditional Chinese medicine research: Two decades of development, its impact, and breakthrough. J Evid Based Med. 2021 Feb;14(1):65-74.
12. Cheng CW, Wu TX, Shang HC, Li YP, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 27;167(2):112-21.
13. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420-5.
14. Wang SC, Han M, Liu JP. [Introduction of clinical pathway and thoughts on its application in Chinese medicine practice]. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2009 Dec;29(12):1064-7.
15. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995 Nov-Dec;123(3):A12-3.
16. Fass R, Vaezi M, Sharma P, Yadlapati R, Hunt B, Harris T, et al. Randomised clinical trial: Efficacy and safety of on-demand vonoprazan versus placebo for non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Nov;58(10):1016-27.
17. Tang XD, Bian LQ, Gao R. [Exploration into the preparation of placebos used in Chinese medicinal clinical trial]. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;29(7):656-8.
18. de Craen AJ, Roos PJ, de Vries AL, Kleijnen J. Effect of colour of drugs: systematic review of perceived effect of drugs and of their effectiveness. BMJ. 1996 Dec 21-28;313(7072):1624-6.
19. Day SJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: blinding in clinical trials and other studies. BMJ. 2000 Aug 19-26;321(7259):504.
20. Barry D. Differential recall bias and spurious associations in case/control studies. Stat Med. 1996 Dec 15;15(23):2603-16.
21. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408-12.
22. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999 Sep 15;282(11):1061-6.
23. Reed MD, Van Nostran W. Assessing pain intensity with the visual analog scale: a plea for uniformity. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;54(3):241-4.
24. Jenkins D, Modolell I. Proton pump inhibitors. BMJ. 2023 Nov 13;383:e070752.
25. Lødrup AB, Reimer C, Bytzer P. Systematic review: symptoms of rebound acid hypersecretion following proton pump inhibitor treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;48(5):515-22.
26. Farrell B, Lass E, Moayyedi P, Ward D, Thompson W. Reduce unnecessary use of proton pump inhibitors. BMJ. 2022 Oct 24;379:e069211.