Commentary - Archives of Proteomics and Bioinformatics (2021) Volume 2, Issue 1
Possible Functions of the Conserved Peptides Encoded by the RNAprecursors of miRNAs in Plants
Sergey Y. Morozov1,2*, Dmitriy Y. Ryazantsev3, Tatiana N. Erokhina3
1Department of Virology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
2Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Ru
3Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
- *Corresponding Author:
- Dr. Sergey Morozov
Received date: April 27, 2021, Accepted date: May 21, 2021
Citation: Morozov SY, Ryazantsev DY, Erokhina TN. Possible Functions of the Conserved Peptides Encoded by the RNAprecursors
of miRNAs in Plants. Arch Proteom and Bioinform. 2021; 2(1): 1-3.
Copyright: © 2021 Morozov SY, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short double-stranded regulatory molecules derived from precursor transcripts called primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) and transcribing in the nucleus from chromosomal DNA by the RNA polymerase II. These pri-miRNAs were shown to contain internal imperfect hairpin structures which are processed by DCL (dicer-like) enzyme complexes thus giving rise to miRNA molecules [1-3]. Remarkably, in recent years, pioneer studies of researches from France (UNIVERSITE TOULOUSE III – PAUL SABATIER, Toulouse, and CENTRE NATIONAL de la RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE, Paris) have shown that some plant pri-miRNAs, which previously were considered as non-coding, can be translated and produce small peptides (micropeptides) [ “cap”-structure and poly(A)-tail and include specific4]. Studies on Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago truncatula have shown that some pri-miRNAs contain in their 5’-terminal part functional ORFs (open reading frames) encoding the so-called miPEPs (At-miPEP165a and Mt-miPEP171b, respectively) [4-8]. Importantly, miPEPs were later found
to be encoded by the animal pri-miRNAs [9,10].
In general, studies using bioinformatics, GUS (β-glucuronidase) reporter assays, immunoblot techniques, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) based editing, as well as ribosome profiling [4,6,10-16] resulted in identification of the novel miPEPs in A. thaliana and other plants including Arachis hypogaea, Vitis vinifera and Glycine max [15,17,18]. Our recent works have revealed additional plant micropeptide, miPEP156a, which is evolutionarily conserved in many plants of the family Brassicaceae [19,20].
Physiological Effects of miPEPs on Plant Growth and Development
Most studies with miPEPs were performed either with modulating the miPEP ORF expression in planta, or with external treatment of plants with synthetic peptides. In general, these works showed that miPEPs may regulate root development, stem growth and flowering parameters [12,14]. Particularly, when At-miPEP164a, At-miPEP165a and At-miPEP319a peptides were applied to plants, the flowering day was decreased with concomitant increase in the length of inflorescence stem [4,7,8]. Root modifications (namely, stimulation of main root growth and decreased lateral root formation) have been found after external application of At-miPEP165a and Mt-miPEP171b resulting in highly increased cell proliferation in meristematic zone as well as cell elongation [4,7,8,21]. On the other hand, it is known that plant watering with Gm-miPEP172c may affect nodulation and cause the increase in nodule number in legumes . Similarly, Vvi-miPEP171d1 promotes adventitious root development and restricts primary root development in grapevine when it is applied exogenously or overexpressed . Knock-out mutants of miPEP858a in Arabidopsis performed with CRISPR editing technologies showed evident decrease in root length. Whereas, the exogenous treatment of mutant plants with this particular miPEP results in increase of the root length . These experiments also showed that At-miPEP858a controls flavonoid biosynthesis and plant development by regulating the expression of genes involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway and auxin signaling .
Our experiments with miPEP156a applied to Brassica species also showed significant positive effect of miPEP on the primary root growth in seedlings .
Potential Molecular Mechanisms of miPEPs Affecting Plant Development
Exogenous application and overexpression of micropeptides resulted in enhanced accumulation of their respective pri-miRNAs, pre-miRNAs and mature miRNAs [6,12,14]. Particularly, micropeptides At-miPEP165a, miPEP160b, miPEP164a, miPEP319, miPEP169d, miPEP171e and Mt-miPEP171b positively regulated the accumulation of their mature miRNAs [7,8]. In grape, an exogenous application of vvi-miPEP171d1 can enhancing the expression of vvi-MIR171d . Experiments with transcriptional inhibitors strongly suggest that the enhancement of mature miRNA occurs at transcriptional level .
Further, promoter activity analysis directly indicated the role of miPEP858a in regulation of its own promoter activity in reporter GUS gene transcription assay . Our experiments with miPEP156a in Brassica species also showed evident positive effect of miPEP on the primiR156a formation . However, it cannot be excluded that some miPEPs may act not only directly by enhancing own pri-miRNA promoter activity, but also indirectly by regulating transcription of specific transcriptional factors required for the promoter activity.
Tissue-specific Distribution of miPEPs in Plants
Many plant-specific small peptides are considered as long-distance signaling molecules involved in root development [22,23], so it is interesting whether miPEPs can be involved in root-to-shoot communication. Studies of the ability of fluorescently labelled miPEP165a to move in Arabidopsis roots after exogenous application showed that the labelled peptide entered into the epidermis and the pericycle but did not enter the root phloem and move to upper parts of the plant . These data were confirmed in a later study  which also suggested that miPEPs cannot migrate throughout the plant. However, in our work with exogeneous miPEP156a , it was shown that micropeptide can move actively to the leaves of seedlings. Further studies are required to understand the cause of the above-mentioned contradictions between At-miPEP165a and Brassica miPEP156a: either plants specific differences or different modes of action between micropeptides.
Currently, some new questions are being raised in relation to the fine molecular mechanisms underlying miPEPs functions. Particularly, how are the promoter regions interacting with miPEPs to activate pri-miRNA transcription? If this recognition is really taking place, how the transportation of miPEPs across cell wall, plasma membrane, and to the nucleus occurs? Moreover, new studies should be performed to reveal specific aspects of miPEP dynamics concerning changes in subcellular and tissue-specific accumulation of peptides in relation to plant ontogenetic stages. Importance of the additional studies in these directions is highlighted by alternative findings concerning a) subcellular localization of plant miPEPs and b) positive regulation of pri-miRNA/miRNA expression by miPEPs. Particularly, recent studies with human miPEPs showed that induction of pri-miRNA/ miRNA expression is not a general rule of microprotein functioning . Nevertheless, due to the quite difference between mammal cell and plant cell, this statement from the human might not be the same to plant cells. In the case of plants, it was shown that At-miPEP165a does not move
into plant cell nuclei  that seems inconsistent with the
ability of miPEP165a to activate transcription of own primiRNA
. Nevertheless, in some other papers, it was found that plant-expressed Mt-miPEP171b is localized in
small nuclear bodies , and exogenous miPEP156a in Brassica sp. migrates efficiently into nuclei of phloem and leaf cells . So, it is obvious that a broad comparative
investigation of subcellular localization and promoter
binding activity of different miPEPs in the diverse plants
should be carried in the nearest future.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest
regarding the publication of this paper.
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 19-04-00174a).
- Rogers K, Chen X. Biogenesis, turnover, and mode
of action of plant microRNAs. Plant Cell. 2013 Jul 23; 25(7):2383-2399.
- Li M, Yu B. Recent advances in the regulation of plant
miRNA biogenesis, RNA Biology. 2021 Mar 17;1-10.
- Wang J, Mei J, Ren G. Plant microRNAs: biogenesis,
homeostasis, and degradation. Frontiers in Plant Sciences.2019 Mar 27;10:360.
- Lauressergues D, Couzigou JM, Clemente HS, Martinez
Y, Dunand C, Bécard G, et al. Primary transcripts of
microRNAs encode regulatory peptides. Nature. 2015 Apr
- Couzigou JM, Lauressergues D, Bécard G, Combier JP. miRNA-encoded peptides (miPEPs): A new tool to analyze the roles of miRNAs in plant biology. RNA Biology. 2015 Sep 23;12(11):1178-1180.
- Yeasmin F, Yada T, Akimitsu N. Micropeptides Encoded
in Transcripts Previously Identified as Long Noncoding
RNAs: A New Chapter in Transcriptomics and Proteomics.
Frontiers in Genetics. 2018 Apr 25;9:144.
- Combier JP, Lauressergues D, Becard G. Use of
micropeptides for promoting plant growth. US Patent
10,53,214 B2. Feb 18 2020.
- Combier JP, Lauressergues D, Becard G, Payre F, Plaza
S, Cavaille J. Micropeptides and use of same for modulating
gene expression. US Patent US 20200131234A1. Apr 30
- Fang J, Morsalin S, Rao VN, Reddy ESP. Decoding of
non-coding DNA and non-coding RNA: pri-micro RNAencoded
novel peptides regulate migration of cancer cells.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmacology.
- Prel A, Dozier C, Combier JP, Plaza S, Besson,
A. Evidence That Regulation of Pri-miRNA/miRNA
Expression Is Not a General Rule of miPEPs Function in
Humans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
2021 Mar 26;22(7):3432.
- Hellens RP, Brown CM, Chisnall MAW, Waterhouse
PM, Macknight RC. The Emerging World of Small ORFs,
Trends Plant Sciences. 2016 Apr;21(4):317-328.
- Ren Y, Song Y, Zhang L, Guo D, He J, Wang L, et al.
Coding of Non-coding RNA: Insights Into the Regulatory
Functions of Pri-MicroRNA-Encoded Peptides in Plants.
Frontiers Plant Sciences. 2021 Feb 25;12:641351.
- Juntawong P, Girke T, Bazin J, Bailey-Serres J.
Translational dynamics revealed by genome-wide profiling
of ribosome footprints in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA. 2014 Jan 7;111(1):E203-212.
- Prasad A, Sharma N, Prasad M. Noncoding but Coding:
Pri-miRNA into the Action. Trends in Plant Sciences. 2021
- Ram MK, Mukherjee K, Pandey DM. Identification
of miRNA, their targets and miPEPs in peanut (Arachis
hypogaea L.). Computational Biology and Chemistry. 2019
- Sharma A, Badola PK, Bhatia C, Sharma D, Trivedi PK.
Primary transcript of miR858 encodes regulatory peptide
and controls flavonoid biosynthesis and development in
Arabidopsis. Nature Plants. 2020 Oct;6(10):1262-1274.
- Chen QJ, Deng BH, Gao J, Zhao ZY, Chen ZL, Song SR,
et al. A miRNA-encoded small peptide, vvi-miPEP171d1,
regulates adventitious root formation. Plant Physiology.
- Couzigou JM, André O, Guillotin B, Alexandre M,
Combier JP. Use of microRNA-encoded peptide miPEP172c
to stimulate nodulation in soybean. New Phytology. 2016
- Morozov SY, Ryazantsev DY, Erokhina TE.
Bioinformatics Analysis of the Novel Conserved
Micropeptides Encoded by the Plants of Family
Brassicaceae. Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems
Biology. 2019 Oct 15;2(2):066-077.
- Erokhina TE, Ryazantsev DY, Samokhvalova LV,
Mozhaev AA, Orsa AN, Zavriev SK, et al. Activity of
Chemically Synthesized Peptide Encoded by the miR156A
Precursor and Conserved in the Brassicaceae Family
Plants. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2021 May;86(5):551-562.
- Ormancey M, Le Ru A, Duboe C, Jin H, Thuleau
P, Plaza S, et al. Internalization of miPEP165a into
Arabidopsis roots depends on both passive diffusion and
endocytosis-associated processes. International Journal of
Molecular Sciences. 2020 Mar 25;21(7):2266.
- Delay C, Imin N, Djordjevic MA. Regulation of
Arabidopsis root development by small signaling peptides.
Frontiers in Plant Sciences. 2013 Sep 06;4:352.
- Ghorbani S, Lin YC, Parizot B, Fernandez A, Njo MF,
Van de Peer Y, et al. Expanding the repertoire of secretory
peptides controlling root development with comparative
genome analysis and functional assays. Journal of
Experimental Botany. 2015 Aug;66(17):5257-5269.