5-Fluorouracil, Capecitabine, Fluoropyrimidines, DPYD gene
|• Colon and rectal cancer|
|• Anal cancer|
|• Breast cancer|
|• Esophageal cancer|
|• Pancreatic cancer|
|• Gastric cancer|
|• Head and neck cancer|
|• Carcinoma of unknown primary (esp. squamous
|• Neuroendocrine tumors|
|• Thymic cancers|
|• Cervical cancer|
|• Bladder cancer|
|• Hepatobiliary cancers|
|• Topical 5-FU in basal cell cancer of the skin and
Table 1: Indications for 5-Fluorouracil.
However, 31–34% of patients encountered grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) with 0.5% mortality oftennecessitating dose reduction or discontinuation . A significant proportion of these AEs are likely to be the result of inter-individual genetic variation, in particularly such as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD). DPYD gene encodes DPD, the rate-limiting enzyme responsible for catabolism of 5-FU and is responsible for >85% of 5-FU elimination. Deficiency of DPD due to DPYD polymorphism gives rise to severe 5-FU AEs from reduced catabolism . This pharmacogenetic ‘DPD syndrome’ manifests typically as severe or fatal diarrhea, mucositis/ stomatitis, myelosuppression and even rare toxicities, such as hepatitis, encephalopathy and acute cardiac ischemia following first or second dose of 5-FU [6-8]. DPYD mutations are found in 50% of severe 5-FU toxicity cases [6-10]. Different methods have been developed to test DPYD abnormalities [11,12].
In addition to DPYD, other pharmacogenetic markers, such as thymidylate synthase (TYMS) has also been reported but with conflicting results . TYMS catalyzes methylation of dUMP to dTMP. As the sole de novo source of thymidylate in the cell it is an important target for 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine (CAP). Overexpression of TYMS has been linked to resistance to these agents both in vitro and in vivo. Cause of variability in TYMS expression is unclear, however, polymorphisms in 5 and 3 untranslated regions (5UTR and 3UTR) of TYMS gene have been described previously and these are suggested to be both predictive to toxicity and prognostic to efficacy with fluoropyrimidines [13-18]. However, the data remains unsettled at present.
Despite the richness of data and constant concern about potential toxicity, especially in relation to DPYD no pharmacogenetic markers of fluoropyrimidine AEs have been recommended by any agencies or organizations till 13 March 2020, the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA’s) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) has recommended that patients receiving fluorouracil given by injection or infusion and the related medicines capecitabine and tegafur should be tested for the lack of DPD before starting treatment . The general guidelines re summarized in Table 2. PRAC has allowed both methods of testing, including measuring the level of uracil in the blood, or by checking for the presence of certain mutations in the gene for DPD which are associated with an increased risk of severe side effects .
|DPD Deficiency||Risk of AEs||Recommendations|
|Higher risk of severe
|• Must not administer fluorouracil injection or infusion,
capecitabine or tegafur.
|Increased risk but
|• Start these drugs at reduced starting dose.
• If tolerated, the dose may be increased if there are no serious
side effects as the effectiveness of a reduced dose has not been
• Regular monitoring of drug levels in the blood may help in
Table 2: Dose recommendation in patients with DPYD abnormalities.
The committee did not mandate the pre-treatment testing or dose adjustments based on DPD activity for patients using topical fluorouracil as the level of fluorouracil absorbed through the skin into the body is extremely low, and the safety of topical fluorouracil is not expected to change in patients with partial or complete DPD deficiency .
Our group has also persistently studying the pharmacogenetic markers associated with these cytotoxic drugs. Here, we described a summary of our study that aimed to identify pharmacogenetic markers predicting fluoropyrimidine AEs. We recorded AEs following 5-FU or capecitabine in a series of 430 patients to associate with DPYD and TYMS. A total of 52 patients were identified with DPYD abnormalities: 11/12 patients had low DPYD activity (range: 0.064 –0.18 nmol /min/ mg). DPYD genotyping showed: IVS14 + 1 G > A (c.1905+1 G > A, rs3918290) 38%, D949V (c.2846A > T, rs67376798) 21%, C29R (rs1801265) 4%, and Y186C (rs115232898, c.557 A > G) 2%. UraBT confirmed DPD deficiency in 2 patients: DOB50 of 49.4% and 52.5%. TYMS genotype abnormalities were identified in 38 patients including 2 patients with both TYMS and DPYD abnormalities. Distributions for TYMS abnormalities were: 5’-TSER: 53% with low expression genotypes (10: 2R/2R; 21: 2R/3RC; 23: 3RC/3RC) and 47% with high expression genotypes (11: 2R/3RG, 54: 3RG/3RC, 37: 3RG/3RG) and 3’-UTR were: 18% with INS/INS (normal), 45% INS/ DEL (intermediate) and 13.6% DEL/DEL (low). 68.7% of patients have ≥ 1 abnormality. All DPYD sequence variants and TYMS del/del or dual abnormalities of 5’-TSER/3’- UTR were significantly associated with grade 3–4 AEs.
Our data clearly supports the decision made by EMA’s PRAC. Recently, uridine triacetate (Vistogard) was approved by FDA to help cancer patients who developed severe toxicity to fluoropyrimidines or overdose [20,21].
We may like to add that probably combined DPYD and TYMS genotyping could identify ≥ 50% of patients, who are at greatest risk of AEs. At present, no formal recommendations regarding testing for DPYD exist in USA except warning on FDA website and prescription inserts. We hope prospective studies will validate the role of TYMs and that DPYD will also be adopted soon in USA.
The authors acknowledge funding from grant R01 CA085381.
1. Diasio RB, Harris BE. Clinical pharmacology of 5-fluorouracil. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 1989 Apr;16(4):215-37.
2. Grem JL. 5-Fluorouracil: Forty-plus and still ticking. A review of its preclinical and clinical development. Investigational New Drugs 18(4): 299- 313, 2000.
3. Saif MW, Katirtzoglou NA, Syrigos KN. Capecitabine: an overview of the side-effects and their management. Anticancer Drugs 19(5): 447-464, 2008.
4. Chen J, Han M, Saif MW. TAS-102 an Emerging Oral Fluoropyrimidine. Anticancer Research. 2016;36(1):21-26.
5. Kadoyama K, Miki I, Tamura T, Brown JB, Sakaeda T, Okuno Y. Adverse event profiles of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine: data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, AERS, and reproducibility of clinical observations. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012;9(1):33-9.
6. Saif MW. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) polymorphism among Caucasian and non- Caucasian patients with 5-FU- and capecitabine-related toxicity using full sequencing of DPYD. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2013 Mar-Apr;10(2):89-92.
7. Saif MW, Lee AM, Offer SM, McConnell K, Relias V, Diasio RB. A DPYD variant (Y186C) specific to individuals of African descent in a patient with life-threatening 5-FU toxic effects: potential for an individualized medicine approach. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2014 Jan;89(1):131- 136.
8. Saif MW, Ezzeldin H, Vance K, Sellers S, Diasio RB. DPYD*2A mutation: the most common mutation associated with DPD deficiency. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 2007 Sep;60(4):503-7.
9. Harris BE, Carpenter JT, Diasio RB. Severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity secondary to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: a potentially more common pharmacogenetic syndrome. Cancer. 1991 Aug 1;68(3):499-501.
10. Etienne MC, Lagrange JL, Dassonville O, Fleming R, Thyss A, Renee N, et al. Population study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1994 Nov;12(11):2248-53.
11. Offer SM, Wegner NJ, Fossum C, Wang K, Diasio RB. Phenotypic Profiling of DPYD Variations Relevant to 5-Fluorouracil Sensitivity Using Real-time Cellular Analysis and In Vitro Measurement of Enzyme Activity. Cancer Research. 2013 Mar 15;73(6):1958-68.
12. Boisdron-Celle M, Remaud G, Traore S, Poirier AL, Gamelin L, Morel A, et al. 5-fluorouracil- related severe toxicity: a comparison of different methods for the pretherapeutic detection of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Cancer Letters. 2007 May 8;249(2):271-82.
13. Pullarkat ST, Stoehlmacher J, Ghaderi V, Xiong YP, Ingles SA, Sherrod A, et al. Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism determines response and toxicity of 5-FU chemotherapy. The Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2001;1(1):65-70.
14. Wang B, Walsh SJ, Saif MW. Pancytopenia and Severe Gastrointestinal Toxicities Associated with 5-FU in a Patient with TYMS Polymorphism. Cureus. 2016 Sep 21;8(9):e798.
15. Saif MW, Smith M, Maloney A. The First Case of Severe Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Associated with 5-FU in a Patient with Abnormalities of Both DPYD and TYMS Genes. Cureus. 2016 Sep 14;8(9):e783.
16. Wilks AB, Saif MW. First Case of Foot Drop Associated with Capecitabine in a Patient with Thymidylate Synthase Polymorphism. Cureus. 2017 Jan 24;9(1):e995.
17. Shahrokni A, Rajebi MR, Saif MW. Toxicity and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine in a patient with TYMS gene polymorphism: A challenge or a dilemma? Clinical Colorectal Cancer. 2009 Oct;8(4):231-4.
18. Saif MW. Capecitabine-induced cerebellar toxicity and TYMS pharmacogenetics. Anticancer Drugs. 2019 Apr;30(4):431-434.
19. https://www.esmo.org/oncology-news/ema-providesnew-testing-and-treatment-recommendations-forfluorouracil-capecitabine-and-tegafur (Last assessed June 22, 2020).
20. Ma WW, Saif MW, El-Rayes BF, Fakih MG, Cartwright TH, Posey JA, et al. Emergency use of uridine triacetate for the prevention and treatment of life-threatening 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine toxicity. Cancer. 2017 Jan 15;123(2):345-56.
21. Saif MW, Diasio RB. Benefit of uridine triacetate (Vistogard) in rescuing severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) deficiency. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 2016 Jul 1;78(1):151-6.