Loading

Mini Review Open Access
Volume 4 | Issue 1 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.33696/pathology.4.042

Current Understanding and Gaps in Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection

  • 1University of Carabobo, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Institute of Medical and Biotechnology Research, Carabobo state, Venezuela
  • 2Ministry of Popular Power for Health, Venezuelan Institute of Social Security, Carabobo state, Venezuela
  • 3University of Carabobo, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Carabobo state, Venezuela
+ Affiliations - Affiliations

*Corresponding Author

Gilberto Bastidas, bastidasprotozoo@hotmail.com

Received Date: September 26, 2023

Accepted Date: November 08, 2023

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is a bacterial infection that most frequently causes sexually transmitted infection in the world, therefore, it is considered a serious public health problem. The objective of this commentary is to describe in a condensed but sufficient manner what has been reported by researchers on the subject based on the documentary review available in digital repositories on aspects of the infection. The information obtained was grouped into 7 categories as a result of the analysis of relevant ideas. There are many aspects to be revealed in terms of pathogenesis, biology of the microbial agent, and treatment, hence the need to generate new knowledge in this regard and to carry out thematic consolidations such as the one presented here.

Keywords

Chlamydia trachomatis, Sexually transmitted infection, Public health, Infertility, Perinatal mortality

Introduction

In developed and developing countries, Chlamydia trachomatis is the most important pathogen causing sexually transmitted infection [1], typically characterized by cervicitis and urethritis and causing sequelae as severe as pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, ectopic pregnancy, repeated abortions, low birth weight, increased perinatal mortality and conjunctivitis and pneumonia in newborns [1,2]. For all the above, C. trachomatis infections are considered an important public health problem with high incidence and consequences on reproductive health and other organs and systems of the human body [3-7].

There is relevant information about this fearsome scourge, although incomplete, hence the need to recommend new research on the etiological agent, pathogenesis, immune response, diagnosis and treatment, and to offer writings that show in a condensed but sufficient way what has been reported by researchers on the subject [8].

The objective of this article is to facilitate students, professionals, and health authorities in understanding the greatest number of variables on which action must be taken to control such a prevalent population health problem.

Methodology

This article was based on the documentary review available in digital repositories on aspects of C. trachomatis infection, based on descriptors or keywords closely related to the topic. Repeated documents and those without clear or original conclusions were excluded. All original documents published from 1983 to August 2023 were included. The analysis of the ideas allowed them to be grouped into 7 categories (epidemiology of C. trachomatis, causal agent, pathogenesis, host immune response, diagnosis, treatment, and conclusions) for easy reading.

Epidemiology of C. trachomatis

Throughout the world C. trachomatis is the bacterial infection that most frequently causes sexually transmitted infections (85 million cases are recorded annually in the world, with a global prevalence between 4.4 and 6.6%, with recurrent infections common and with high rates in developing countries despite under-reporting motivated primarily by the high cost of diagnostic tests). Mainly in sexually active young adults, with a higher prevalence in women in relation to men, and more frequent in the age period between 15 and 19 years, however, it is evident that the case mix differs between countries, therefore, it is recommended to adopt a rigorous registry [9-13].

Especially because the prevalence of C. trachomatis infection is different according to the different diagnostic methods used in the detection of this bacteria, for example, with direct procedures it has been possible to detect only between 0.7-2.3% of infected people, at this low sensitivity and specificity, it is added that at the time of bacterial diagnosis the patient is receiving antibiotics prescribed for conditions related to the genital sphere that mask the results obtained by direct diagnostic methods, hence serological diagnostic methods are preferred for population studies. The trend is towards an increase in the number of cases, except in those countries that have adopted national health programs for education, detection and treatment of C. trachomatis, and of course its complications [9,14-16].

It is prudent to highlight that with specific antibiotics, C. trachomatis infection heals easily with resolution in days or weeks, but since 70% of women and 50% of men do not show symptoms of genital infection (despite the high cure rate, recurrent and exacerbating infections occur), the health problem prevails or complicates its control, since they act as reservoirs capable of transmitting the infection to their sexual partners and because recurrence is common because the immune response against the pathogen is partially protective [8]. However, older women have an increased risk of infection by this bacteria if they are nulliparous, single, black, and have low income. Furthermore, in women, regardless of age, the large number of sexual partners, the beginning of a new sexual relationship, not using barrier methods such as contraceptives, and recurrent infections by Neisseria gonorrheae appear as risk factors for suffering from C. trachomatis infection [10,17-20].

Thus, in Western populations, C. trachomatis infection has been shown in epidemic proportions with severe consequences and negative impact for people and the community in general, specifically it affects fertility and the product of conception, and in what generally affects the socio-productive development of countries, due to the great economic and financial investment that the State must invest to treat the complications that this infection leaves in those affected (thus, more than 6 million blind people are reported in the world), especially ocular pathologies, the risk of developing squamous cell cervical carcinoma [10,21].

Causal Agent

C. trachomatis although phylogenetically distinct, is considered an obligate intracellular gram-negative bacteria (incapable of generating its own energy and dependent on the metabolism of the host cell) with a unique biphasic development cycle (the bacteria is found in two forms, one extracellular called elemental bodies and the intracellular body known as reticulate bodies), which belongs to the order Chlamydiales, family Chlamydiaceae and the genus Chlamydia (to which C. muradum, the pathogen of mice and hamsters, and C. suis that infects pigs also belong), They lack mitochondria, reproduce by binary fission, have DNA, RNA, and enzymes, and are capable of lysing the infected cell in 48 hours [22,23].

In their life cycle, the elementary bodies (osmotically stable and metabolically inactive) are considered the infecting forms, which after joining penetrate the cells by a still unknown mechanism, and remain internal in vacuoles, within these and after several transformations they differentiate in reticulated bodies (metabolically active). The reticular bodies are capable of dividing by binary fission approximately 18 hours after infection, the resulting reticular bodies are differentiated again into elementary bodies to be expelled from the cells, by exocytosis or cell lysis, 48 to 72 hours after infection [24].

The clinical diagnostic and epidemiological importance of the identification and classification of different isolates of C. trachomatis from the genital tract is recognized to establish test parameters of cure, as well as persistent infections versus reinfection and its role in complications, and in the association of strain-dependent virulence in relation to severe genital tract disease in women [10,25].

Currently, based on the functional variability of proteins (a product of evolutionary selection, for example the major chlamydial outer membrane protein [MOMP]), 18 C. trachomatis serotypes have been identified with unique attributes related to the severity of the disease and the prevalence of infection, of these D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K are related to genital pathologies (disease-specific phenotypes). In addition, there are several candidates for virulence factors, among them are known: the polymorphic outer membrane autotransporter family of proteins, stress response proteins, the putative large cytotoxin, type three secretion effectors, and proteins or other regulatory factors produced by the cryptic plasmid. The incubation period of genital infection is 6-14 days, with a tendency to chronicity and generation of complications such as infertility, ectopic pregnancies and pathology of the perinatal sphere [10,26,27].

Serotypes A, B, Ba, and C have affinity for the connective epithelium, therefore, they can cause eye infections that can progress to trachoma (the main cause of preventable blindness). Serotypes D-K, Da, Ia, and the genovariant Ja infect the genital epithelium and cause urogenital tract infections. Seotypes L1, L2, L2a, and L3 are capable of infecting the genital epithelium and also monocytes and causing a systemic disease known as lymphogranuloma venereum [21,27-29].

Pathogenesis of C. trachomatis Infection

In women C. trachomatis is the cause of pelvic inflammatory disease, in men it is capable of infecting the accessory sexual glands and producing epididymitis, prostatitis, and urethritis (in the acute phase), and in both cases infertility. Furthermore, in men and women, already in the chronic or complicated phase, they generate glaucoma, endocarditis, coronary heart disease, chronic asthma, reactive arthritis, hepatitis and urethral syndrome, among others, which is why the pathogenic mechanisms involved in them are studied intensely and continuously the genesis of the aforementioned complications [16,30,31].

In this sense, several strategies have been proposed through which C. trachomatis leads to chronic infection, among them: asymptomatic infections by remaining silent that favor bacterial progression towards the most internal tissues (refers to the fact that the pathogenic agent possibly spreads found in an atypical, intracellular and metabolically less active state that is difficult to resolve not only by the host defense system, but also by antibiotic therapy); and variable immunodominant antigenic epitopes of the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) consequently, specific immunity against strains is not produced (therefore multiple reinfection by different serotypes and by the same serotype is possible), but an autopathological immune response may occur [32-35].

As well as hypersensitivity mediated by the T-helper type 2 (Th2) response, which is ineffective and long-lasting, but can lead to tissue damage; the accumulation of heat shock proteins (hsp60) as a consequence of multiple reinfections by C. trachomatis, a protein with a high proportion of identity with the human protein, therefore autoimmunity can occur when human tolerance to its own hsp60 is broken; and that the antibodies generated by C. trachomatis infection do not inactivate the parasites inside the cells. From the above, it follows that serious sequelae due to chlamydial infection are observed only if it is chronic and persistent inflammation (sustained and harmful possibly due to residual antigens and not the persistence of viable bacteria) is the cause of fibrosis and the scars that characterize all chlamydial diseases [36-39].

One aspect to consider is the proven possibility of co-infection of C. trachomatis with other bacteria, especially with Mycoplasma genitalium (with high co-infection rates of up to 36%), causing emerging sexually transmitted infection and with high resistance to drugs. In this sense, M. genitalium causes endometrial infection associated with endometriosis due to C. trachomatis [40].

Finally, the molecular mechanism of bacterial persistence is pointed out: the deprivation of tryptophan and cysteine, essential amino acids for the expression of late expression proteins such as MOMP and proteins rich in cysteines that cause the cessation of the division of the reticular bodies as well as dedifferentiation of them in elementary bodies, in other words the persistence of C. trachomatis is a consequence of undifferentiated intracellular particles; and the abrogation of cell division although DNA replication and segregation persist [32,41].

Host Immune Response Against C. trachomatis Infection

The cellular response is necessary in the resolution of the primary infection, centered on CD4+Th1 lymphocytes, since it produces antichlamydial immunity by allowing greater activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and secretion of gamma interferon (INFγ). The participation of CD4+Th2 lymphocytes seems not to be sufficient, since it reduces the infection without resolving it, so it is considered an ineffective response because it does not eliminate reticular bodies or persistent intracellular particles. Without a doubt, the polarization of the immune response towards the Th1 profile requires the secretion of INFγ (by natural killer cells) and interleukin-12 (by dendritic cells). It is also known that factors such as cicatricial trachoma in ethnic groups with the allele (IL-10-1082G) favor the Th2 response, favoring the production of IL-10 [42-46].

Humoral immunity also participates in the defense against C. trachomatis infection through humoral antibodies, isotypes IgM, IgA, and IgG, of which the first to respond is the secretory IgA at the site of infection, then the IgM participate, IgA and IgG, between 5 and 20 weeks after the infection occurred. In the chronic disease, IgA and IgG are present, in the acute phase the titers are not at constant levels. In the cured infection, only IgG is detected [10, 47].

Diagnosis

Among the diagnostic tests, the direct staining of the cells obtained from the lesion and the cell culture as a confirmatory diagnostic method (McCoy cell culture) stand out, because in primary genital infections, even of an asymptomatic or subclinical nature, the pathogen can be easily isolated, direct immunofluorescence is also mentioned as a test in this group, due to its speed of application, low cost, high sensitivity (70-100%) and specificity (95%). Recently (the 80's), nucleic acid amplification tests have emerged, specifically the polymerase chain reaction and the ligase chain reaction, with sensitivity and specificity of 100% [48]. The determination of IgA, IgM, and IgG titers is the indirect technique (serology) in the case of suspected first infection and in epidemiological studies to determine incidence and prevalence of infection in populations [49,50].

It is important to note that amplification technologies without culture and DNA extraction focus on the direct visualization of the microbe by staining with specific antibodies labeled with fluorescein, on the immunohistochemical detection of antigens and detection of hybridization with a DNA probe, among others., and these techniques have the advantages: not requiring extensive experience or facilities to perform cultures, short time to obtain results, and fewer requirements for transporting samples and standardization of the procedure, accompanied by high performance (sensitivity and specificity), but in a lower proportion than bacterial cultures and molecular biology tests [51].

 

It is recommended to carry out a diagnosis in people at risk of suffering from C. trachomatis infection, in those who suffer from other sexually transmitted infections that include their partner, when they have a new sexual partner (last 6 months), when they have more than 2 new partners in the last year, in some clinical conditions (cervicitis, urethritis, and infertility), in cytology with atypical cells suspicious of human papillomavirus or cervical cancer, and during pregnancy [52-54].

Treatment

The treatment is based on antibiotics capable of penetrating the lipophilic plasma membranes in order to reach the reticular bodies (reproductive phase), which are metabolically active and therefore susceptible to the action of these medications. In this sense, are used, cyclines (doxycycline and tetracycline), quinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and levofloxacin) and macrolides (erythromycin and azithromycin). Amoxicillin is only used in pregnant women [54].

With the administration of antibiotics, microbiological cure rates are obtained that exceed 70% depending on the drug administered, however, therapeutic failures may occur that result in chronicity of the disease and the persistence of the bacteria for many years, associated with these failures: the age of the patient, nutrient restriction (iron) and the renewal of sexual activity as indirect factors, and heterotypic bacterial resistance as direct factors (only 1% of the bacterial population is multiresistant, less metabolically active forms of C. trachomatis ), recurrences with the same genotype (D, I, Ia, H, and Ja, these serotypes can persist for several years regardless of the treatment), low adhesion, pharmacokinetics and tissue availability of the drug, this last factor has been combated with the encapsulation of the antibiotic in liposomes (they allow direct transport to the site of infection and avoid the loss of the antibiotic due to interaction with proteins) [55-61].

It has also been pointed out that penicillin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin participate in the induction of persistence of bacterial infection by C. trachomatis, since they generate the so-called forms of penicillin (enlarged and aberrant reticulated bodies, possibly due to the inhibition of the synthesis of peptidoglycan), which after the suspension of these antibiotics resume normal growth, then it can be noted that some antibiotics used in the treatment of C. trachomatis infection favor its persistence instead of resolving the infection [62-66].

Conclusions

C. trachomatis infection continues to be the most frequently observed in sexual transmission with high prevalence rates in low-income countries, more frequent in women and in the age group between 15 and 19 years, except for in those countries that have adopted health control programs, the trend is towards an increase in the number of cases. C. trachomatis is considered an obligate intracellular gram-negative bacterium, although it is phylogenetically distinct. The clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiological importance of the identification and classification of different C. trachomatis isolates is recognized in establishing test parameters for cure, persistent infections versus reinfection and its role in complications. Rapid non-invasive diagnostic tests are required to detect infection in asymptomatic individuals. There are several strategies that C. trachomatis uses to ensure its persistence in the host and produce chronic infection and clinical complications.

The resolution of the primary infection, that centered on CD4+Th1 lymphocytes, corresponds to the cellular response. In terms of diagnosis, the isolation or direct visualization of the bacteria is the recommended test, however, molecular biology methods based on the amplification of nucleic acids with significantly high sensitivity and specificity are currently emerging, and serological tests continue to be used in studies risk populations. In relation to treatment, the recommended antibiotics are those capable of penetrating the lipophilic plasma membranes and the bacterial forms sensitive to these, the reticular bodies. The percentage of cure with specific antibiotic therapy can exceed 70%, however, therapeutic failures are reported that culminate in chronicity of the disease and complications. There are many aspects to be revealed in terms of pathogenesis, biology of the microbial agent, and treatment, hence the need to generate new knowledge in this regard and to present thematic consolidations as was done in this article.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Stamm WE. Chlamydia trachomatis infections: progress and problems. J Infect Dis. 1999 Mar;179 Suppl 2:S380-3.

2. Witkin SS, Minis E, Athanasiou A, Leizer J, Linhares IM. Chlamydia trachomatis: the Persistent Pathogen. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017 Oct 5;24(10):e00203-17.

3. Jones RB, Mammel JB, Shepard MK, Fisher RR. Recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from the endometrium of women at risk for chlamydial infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jul;155(1):35-9.

4. Cates W, Wasserheit J. Genital chlamydial infection: Epidemiology and reproductive sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1771-81.

5. Faro S. Chlamydia trachomatis: female pelvic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;164(6 Pt 2):1767-70.

6. McGregor JA, French JI. Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun 1;164(6):1782-9.

7. World Health Organization. Sexually transmited diseases. Press release WHO/64,25 August, 1995. Who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis)?gclid=CjwKCAjw38SoBhB6EiwA8EQVLkXNwWrTlPtx9RJdOfhlfV1Gol3ghPZ1RqB5FDGWekloTgnxwFREKBoCbBEQAvD_BwE.

8. Bastidas G, Medina T, Báez M, Antoima M, Bastidas D. Perspectivas metodológicas de la investigación en salud pública, breve mirada [Methodological perspectives of public health research. A brief look]. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2018 Apr-Jun;35(2):317-320.

9. Pan American Health Organization. Clamidiasis. Sf. https://www.paho.org/es/temas/clamidiasis.

10. Tortolero I. Chlamydia Trachomatis and genital infection. Sexually transmitted disease. Venezuelan Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2007;5(2):22-3.

11. Witkin SS, Minis E, Athanasiou A, Leizer J, Linhares IM. Chlamydia trachomatis: the Persistent Pathogen. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017 Oct 5;24(10):e00203-17.

12. Joya M, Heredia R, Bastidas D, Bastidas G. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in sexually active women in Venezuela. Biomedica. 2022 Sep 2;42(3):522-530.

13. Velasquez N P, Brebi M P, Abarzúa C F. Prevalencia de la infección por Chlamydia trachomatis y su potencial impacto perinatal en pacientes chilenas [Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and a potential perinatal impact in Chilean patients]. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2021 Aug;38(4):523-531.

14. Frost EH, Deslandes S, Bourgaux-Ramoisy D, Bourgaux P. Quantitation of Chlamydia trachomatis by culture, direct immunofluorescence and competitive polymerase chain reaction. Genitourin Med. 1995 Aug 1;71(4):239-43.

15. Joya M, Joya A, Sequera M, Arteaga E, Bastidas G. Infertility and infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active women from Carabobo state, Venezuela. Revista Médica de Risaralda. 2014 Jan;20(1):24-8.

16. Janssen KJ, Dirks JA, Dukers-Muijrers NH, Hoebe CJ, Wolffs PF. Review of Chlamydia trachomatis viability methods: assessing the clinical diagnostic impact of NAAT positive results. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018 Aug 3;18(8):739-47.

17. Joya M, Joya A, Sequera M, Arteaga E, Bastidas G. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in infertile men. Marrow. 2014 Jan 1;23(1):29-33.

18. Ahmed NH, Sharma A, Satpathy G, Titiyal JS, Tandon R, Agarwal T, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis Antigen Positivity in Patients with Different Ocular Manifestations over 8 Years. J Glob Infect Dis. 2018;10(1):16-8.

19. Páez‐Canro C, Alzate JP, Gonzalez LM, Rubio‐Romero JA, Lethaby A, Gaitan HG. Antibiotics for treating urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men and non‐pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019(1): CD010871.

20. Paul KJ, Garcia PJ, Giesel AE, Holmes KK, Hitti JE. Generation C: prevalence of and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis among adolescents and young women in Lima, Peru. J Womens Health. 2009 Sep 1;18(9):1419-24.

21. Mabey DC, Solomon AW, Foster A. Trachoma. The Lancet. 2003 Jul 19;362(9379):223-9.

22. Taylor-Robinson D. The discovery of Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Feb;93(1):10.

23. Lienard J, Croxatto A, Prod'hom G, Greub G. Estrella lausannensis, a new star in the Chlamydiales order. Microbes Infect. 2011 Dec 1;13(14-15):1232-41.

24. Wyrick PB. Intracellular survival by Chlamydia: microreview. Cell Microbiol. 2000 Aug;2(4):275-82.

25. Byrne GI. Chlamydia trachomatis strains and virulence: rethinking links to infection prevalence and disease severity. J Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 15;201(Supplement_2):S126-33.

26. Everett KD, Bush RM, Andersen AA. Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. nov. and Simkaniaceae fam. nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for the identification of organisms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1999 Apr;49(2):415-40.

27. Mabey D, Peeling RW. Lymphogranuloma venereum. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2002 Apr 1;78(2):90-2.

28. Myers GS, Grinvalds R, Booth S, Hutton SI, Binks M, Kemp DJ, et al. Expression of two novel proteins in Chlamydia trachomatis during natural infection. Microb Pathog. 2000 Aug 1;29(2):63-72.

29. Lesiak-Markowicz I, Schötta AM, Stockinger H, Stanek G, Markowicz M. Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in urogenital and ocular samples collected 2014–2017 from Austrian patients. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18327.

30. Cossé MM, Hayward RD, Subtil A. One Face of Chlamydia trachomatis: The Infectious Elementary Body. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2018;412:35-58.

31. Nilsson S, Nilsson B, Johannisson G, Lycke E. Acute epididymitis and chlamydia trachomatis. InAnnales Chirurgiae Et Gynaecologiae. 1984;73(1):42-4.

32. Beatty WL, Byrne GI, Morrison RP. Repeated and persistent infection with Chlamydia and the development of chronic inflammation and disease. Trends Microbiol. 1994 Mar 1;2(3):94-8.

33. Bastidas G. Parasites and parasitic diseases. Intechopen. 2019.

34. Bastidas G, Kambo A. 2020. Parasitology and Microbiology Research. Intechopen. eBook (PDF).

35. Millman KL, Tavaré S, Dean D. Recombination in the ompA gene but not the omcB gene of Chlamydia contributes to serovar-specific differences in tissue tropism, immune surveillance, and persistence of the organism. J Bacteriol. 2001 Oct 15;183(20):5997-6008.

36. Viale AM, Arakaki AK, Soncini FC, Ferreyra RG. Evolutionary relationships among eubacterial groups as inferred from GroEL (chaperonin) sequence comparisons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1994 Jul;44(3):527-33.

37. Yi Y, Yang X, Brunham RC. Autoimmunity to heat shock protein 60 and antigen-specific production of interleukin-10. Infect Immun. 1997 May;65(5):1669-74.

38. Yang X. Distinct function of Th1 and Th2 type delayed type hypersensitivity: protective and pathological reactions to chlamydial infection. Microsc Res Tech. 2001 May 15;53(4):273-7.

39. Paavonen J, Lähdeaho ML, Puolakkainen M, Mäki M, Parkkonen P, Lehtinen M. Antibody Response to B Cell Epitopes of Chlamydia trachomatis 60-kDa Heat-Shock Protein and Corresponding Mycobacterial and Human Peptides in Infants with Chlamydia) Pneumonitis. J Infect Dis. 1994 Apr 1;169(4):908-11.

40. Borgogna JL, Shardell MD, Yeoman CJ, Ghanem KG, Kadriu H, Ulanov AV, et al. The association of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium infection with the vaginal metabolome. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3420.

41. Belland RJ, Nelson DE, Virok D, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, et al. Transcriptome analysis of chlamydial growth during IFN-γ-mediated persistence and reactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 23;100(26):15971-6.

42. Tseng CT, Rank RG. Role of NK cells in early host response to chlamydial genital infection. Infection and Immunity. 1998 Dec 1;66(12):5867-75.

43. Hawkins RA, Rank RG, Kelly KA. A Chlamydia trachomatis-specific Th2 clone does not provide protection against a genital infection and displays reduced trafficking to the infected genital mucosa. Infect Immun. 2002 Sep;70(9):5132-9.

44. Mozzato-Chamay N, Mahdi OS, Jallow O, Mabey DC, Bailey RL, Conway DJ. Polymorphisms in candidate genes and risk of scarring trachoma in a Chlamydia trachomatis—endemic population. J Infect Dis. 2000 Nov 1;182(5):1545-8.

45. Matyszak MK, Young JL, Gaston JH. Uptake and processing of Chlamydia trachomatis by human dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2002 Mar;32(3):742-51.

46. Jordan SJ, Gupta K, Ogendi BM, Bakshi RK, Kapil R, Press CG, et al. The predominant CD4+ Th1 cytokine elicited to Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women is tumor necrosis factor alpha and not interferon gamma. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017 Apr;24(4):e00010-17.

47. Mpiga P, Ravaoarinoro M. Chlamydia trachomatis persistence: an update. Microbiological Research. 2006 Jan 1;161(1):9-19.

48. Hamdad F, Orfila J, Boulanger JC, Eb F. Infections urogénitales féminines à Chlamydia trachomatis. Meilleures approches diagnostiques. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 2004 Dec 1;32(12):1064-74.

49. Brunham RC, Maclean IW, Binns B, Peeling RW. Chlamydia trachomatis: its role in tubal infertility. J Infect Dis. 1985 Dec 1;152(6):1275-82.

50. Greer M, Elnaggar JH, Taylor CM, Shen L. Mycoplasma decontamination in Chlamydia trachomatis culture: a curative approach. Pathog Dis. 2021 Dec;79(9):ftab056.

51. Black CM. Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jan;10(1):160-84.

52. Varela JA, Otero L, Junquera ML, Melón S, del Valle A, Vázquez F. Research on sexually transmitted infections in asymptomatic heterosexual males whose partners have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Actas Dermo-sifiliograficas. 2006 Jun 1;97(5):319-22.

53. Sixt BS, Núñez-Otero C, Kepp O, Valdivia RH, Kroemer G. Chlamydia trachomatis fails to protect its growth niche against pro-apoptotic insults. Cell Death Differ. 2019 Aug;26(8):1485-500.

54. Thapa J, Watanabe T, Isoba M, Okubo T, Abe K, Minami K, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis isolated from samples in cervicovaginal Sapporo, Japan, reveals the circulation of genetically diverse strains. BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(1):53.

55. Guaschino S, Ricci G. How, and how efficiently, can we treat Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Dec 1;16(6):875-88.

56. Jones RB, Van Der Pol B, Martin DH, Shepard MK. Partial characterization of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates resistant to multiple antibiotics. J Infect Dis. 1990 Dec 1;162(6):1309-15.

57. Lefevre JC, Lepargneur JP, Guion D, Bei S. Tetracycline-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis in Toulouse, France. Pathologie-Biologie. 1997 May 1;45(5):376-8.

58. Raulston JE. Response of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E to iron restriction in vitro and evidence for iron-regulated chlamydial proteins. Infect Immun. 1997 Nov;65(11):4539-47.

59. Harper A, Pogson CI, Jones ML, Pearce JH. Chlamydial development is adversely affected by minor changes in amino acid supply, blood plasma amino acid levels, and glucose deprivation. Infect Immun. 2000 Mar 1;68(3):1457-64.

60. Somani J, Bhullar VB, Workowski KA, Farshy CE, Black CM. Multiple drug-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis associated with clinical treatment failure. J Infect Dis. 2000 Apr 1;181(4):1421-7.

61. Sangaré L, Morisset R, Gaboury L, Ravaoarinoro M. Effects of cationic liposome-encapsulated doxycycline on experimental Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in mice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Mar 1;47(3):323-31.

62. Whittington WL, Kent C, Kissinger P, Oh MK, Fortenberry JD, Hillis SE, et al. Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study. Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Feb 1;28(2):117-23.

63. Johnson FW, Hobson D. The effect of penicillin on genital strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in tissue culture. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1977 Jan 1;3(1):49-56.

64. Segreti J, Kapell KS, Trenholme GM. In vitro activity of β-lactam drugs and sulbactam against Chlamydia trachomatis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 May 1;15(4):371-3.

65. Dreses-Werringloer U, Padubrin I, Jürgens-Saathoff B, Hudson AP, Zeidler H, Köhler L. Persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis is induced by ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Dec 1;44(12):3288-97.

66. Storey C, Chopra I. Affinities of beta-lactams for penicillin binding proteins of Chlamydia trachomatis and their antichlamydial activities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:303-5.

Author Information X