Abstract
This work is an extension of our published article in 2022 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2022.106146), where we further discuss any recent updates in this research and analyse the issues addressed in the focal article.
Calcitriol, the active form of vitamin D3, is also acknowledged as 1α, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D3. This steroid hormone is known for its role in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. Recent studies suggest that calcitriol also exerts anti-cancer effects in various malignancies. We previously reported (in 2022) that treatment with this steroid hormone triggers apoptosis in RD cells, a known rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cell line. RMS is a common soft tissue sarcoma that develops malignant tumor derived from skeletal muscle cells, predominantly affecting children. However, high risk RMS treatment has not been improved over the last three decades, indicating that it is important to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying this disease. There is no updated information about the influence of calcitriol in RMS that could complement and extend our previously published article. However, we recognize the potential of this steroid hormone as a future therapeutic agent in managing this challenging cancer.
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Overview: past and newer subtypes
RMS is a malignant tumor that arises from skeletal muscle progenitor cells and is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children [1] but also seen in adolescents and adults. Despite advancements in treatment, RMS remains challenging due to its aggressive nature and variable response to conventional therapies. Calcitriol, the hormonally active form of vitamin D, has been investigated for its potential anti-cancer properties [2]. This article supplements foregoing investigations [3] and examines how calcitriol affects RMS cells, focusing on its mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential. RMS was classified into several subtypes based on histological and genetic features [4]. The most common subtypes of RMS include embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, and pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, each varying in clinical presentation, prognosis, and treatment response [5,6]:
Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: Includes botryoid variant, anaplasia and malignant ectomesenchymoma [7]. These present remarkable resemblance to developing embryonic skeletal muscle. It is the most common soft tissue sarcoma occurring in younger children and is often associated with a more favorable prognosis [1].
Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: Characterized by distinct alveolar structures and commonly affects adolescents and young adults. It is linked to specific genetic alterations, such as the PAX3-FKHR fusion gene [8].
Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma: The least common subtype usually found in adults and associated with a more aggressive clinical course [9,10].
A new subtype of RMS that was genetically characterized, called Spindle Cell/ Sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma [7]. The tumors affect patients of all age groups and are localized mostly in craniofacial bones [11].
Current treatment strategies
RMS represents about 4.5% of all pediatric cancers [12] and 50% of soft tissue sarcomas in this age group [13]. The current treatment strategies of this sarcoma typically involve a multimodal approach, incorporating surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The choice of therapy is influenced by the tumor's histological subtype, stage, and location.
Surgery: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment for localized RMS. Complete surgical excision is crucial for improving prognosis, though achieving negative margins can be challenging, particularly in cases where the tumor is located in anatomically complex regions [14].
Chemotherapy: Chemotherapy is a fundamental component of the treatment regimen for RMS, particularly in cases with non-localized disease. The most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents include vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide, which have been shown to improve survival rates in both localized and metastatic RMS [15]. Recent advancements in chemotherapy regimens, such as the incorporation of ifosfamide and etoposide, have further enhanced treatment efficacy [16].
Radiation therapy: Radiation therapy is employed for local control, particularly when surgical resection is incomplete or when the tumor is located in a site where surgery is impractical. The role of radiation therapy is well-documented, and recent studies emphasize the importance of optimizing dosage to balance efficacy and minimize long-term side effects [17].
Emerging treatments and research
Recent research has explored targeted therapies and immunotherapy as potential adjuncts to conventional treatment. Targeted therapies aimed at specific genetic mutations, such as those involving the PAX-FOXO1 fusion gene in alveolar RMS, show promise in preclinical studies [18]. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are being investigated in clinical trials, offering potential new avenues for treatment, especially in refractory or relapsed cases [19]. Molecular research into RMS pathology has revealed a strong connection between genetic and epigenetic alterations and key cellular processes such as growth, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The discovery of PAX-FKHR fusion genes has redirected research efforts towards understanding not only the mechanisms behind chromosomal translocations but also how these oncogenic fusion proteins modify cell phenotypes and can be targeted for therapeutic purposes [20].
Calcitriol
1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol), the active form of vitamin D3, plays a crucial role in maintaining calcium homeostasis and bone health. It is synthesized in the kidneys from its precursor, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, in response to parathyroid hormone (PTH) stimulation and low serum calcium levels [21]. Beyond its well-known effects on calcium and bone metabolism, calcitriol has garnered interest for its broader biological functions, including its impact on cell proliferation, differentiation, and immune modulation [22]. It functions primarily through the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a nuclear receptor that regulates gene expression and also exerts rapid responses [23]. Recent research highlights its role in modulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation in various cancer types [24].
Generalities of the involvement of calcitriol in cancer
The mechanistic effects of calcitriol in the cancer biology were recently reviewed [25]. They have explored the complex interactions initiated by calcitriol in cells and in vivo models of various cancer types, addressing topics such as angiogenesis, regulation of kinase cascades, and inflammation. Notably, the dual nature of calcitriol, as both a suppressor of adaptive immunity and an inducer of innate immunity, makes it an intriguing candidate for treating and preventing inflammation-driven carcinogenic processes. Moreover, its potential to promote the resolution of chronic inflammation and infection warrants further investigations. To point, calcitriol influences cell proliferation and differentiation through its interaction with VDR in a lot of different types of cancer [26]. In various cancer cell lines, calcitriol has been shown to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, suggesting potential therapeutic applications in oncology [27]. Of relevance, this hormone modulates the immune system by influencing the function of both innate and adaptive immune cells. It has been observed to suppress the proliferation of T lymphocytes and modulate cytokine production, which can be beneficial in conditions characterized by excessive inflammation, such as autoimmune diseases related to cancer [28].
Calcitriol-dependent mechanisms of action in rhabdomyosarcoma
There are not recent studies investigating the potential of calcitriol as a therapeutic agent in RMS. Uhmann et al. reported that calcitriol promotes differentiation and additionally inhibits proliferation of ERMS tumor cells in vitro and in vivo [29]. Nevertheless, in our model of ERMS (RD cells) we did not observe calcitriol dependent morphology signs of differentiation [3]. Furthermore, we demonstrated that 1 nM of calcitriol (during 72 h) caused apoptosis of RD cells. However, further studies are needed to elucidate the apoptosis pathways involved in calcitriol dependent apoptosis in RD cells and in other RMS cell lines.
Conclusions
On one hand, calcitriol was proposed as a potential anti-cancer agent [30] and on other hand, it was also recognized that further investigations are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of antineoplastic activity and optimal clinical applications of this steroid hormone in cancer [31]. Many studies indicate that vitamin D compounds possess cancer prevention and treatment properties in both in vitro and in vivo cancer models. Unfortunately, there is still limited information regarding the role of calcitriol in the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma. Epidemiological studies also note an association between low vitamin D levels and the occurrence of cancer, as well as unfavorable outcomes [32]. Given its ability to induce differentiation or apoptosis, inhibit tumor growth and modulate the immune response, calcitriol holds promise as a therapeutic agent in RMS; however more research is needed to reveal the specific role of calcitriol in RMS. It is also necessary to elucidate the actions of calcitriol as a preventive and adjunct treatment in different cancers, including RMS.
Closing Comments
Since 1996, only three scientific studies referring to the actions of calcitriol in RMS have been published: Shabahang et al., 1996 [33]; Uhmann et al., 2012 [29], and Irazoqui et al., 2022 [3].
References
2. Skrajnowska D, Bobrowska-Korczak B. Potential Molecular Mechanisms of the Anti-cancer Activity of Vitamin D. Anticancer Res. 2019 Jul;39(7):3353-63.
3. Irazoqui AP, Gonzalez A, Buitrago C. Effects of calcitriol on the cell cycle of rhabdomyosarcoma cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2022 Sep;222:106146.
4. Parham DM, Barr FG. Classification of rhabdomyosarcoma and its molecular basis. Adv Anat Pathol. 2013 Nov;20(6):387-97.
5. Masola V, Maran C, Tassone E, Zin A, Rosolen A, Onisto M. Heparanase activity in alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: implications for tumor invasion. BMC Cancer. 2009 Aug 28;9:304.
6. Chen C, Dorado Garcia H, Scheer M, Henssen AG. Current and Future Treatment Strategies for Rhabdomyosarcoma. Front Oncol. 2019 Dec 20;9:1458.
7. Leiner J, Le Loarer F. The current landscape of rhabdomyosarcomas: an update. Virchows Arch. 2020 Jan;476(1):97-108.
8. Sorensen PH, Lynch JC, Qualman SJ, Tirabosco R, Lim JF, Maurer HM, et al. PAX3-FKHR and PAX7-FKHR gene fusions are prognostic indicators in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun 1;20(11):2672-9.
9. Furlong MA, Mentzel T, Fanburg-Smith JC. Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: a clinicopathologic study of 38 cases with emphasis on morphologic variants and recent skeletal muscle-specific markers. Mod Pathol. 2001 Jun;14(6):595-603.
10. Agaram NP. Evolving classification of rhabdomyosarcoma. Histopathology. 2022 Jan;80(1):98-108.
11. Fang Z, Duan C, Wang S, Fu L, Yang P, Yu T, et al. Pediatric spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma with FUS-TFCP2 fusion: a case report and literature review. Transl Pediatr. 2024 Jan 29;13(1):178-91.
12. Dasgupta R, Fuchs J, Rodeberg D. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016 Oct;25(5):276-83.
13. Loeb DM, Thornton K, Shokek O. Pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Jun;88(3):615-27, vii.
14. Bompas E, Campion L, Italiano A, Le Cesne A, Chevreau C, Isambert N, et al. Outcome of 449 adult patients with rhabdomyosarcoma: an observational ambispective nationwide study. Cancer Med. 2018 Aug;7(8):4023-35.
15. Miwa S, Yamamoto N, Hayashi K, Takeuchi A, Igarashi K, Tsuchiya H. Recent Advances and Challenges in the Treatment of Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 2;12(7):1758.
16. Sasada S, Kodaira M, Shimoi T, Shimomura A, Yunokawa M, Yonemori K, et al. Ifosfamide and Etoposide Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent/Refractory Rhabdomyosarcoma in Adults. Anticancer Res. 2016 May;36(5):2429-32.
17. Terezakis SA, Wharam MD. Radiotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: indications and outcome. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013 Jan;25(1):27-35.
18. Raze T, Lapouble E, Lacour B, Guissou S, Defachelles AS, Gaspar N, et al. PAX-FOXO1 fusion status in children and adolescents with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: Impact on clinical, pathological, and survival features. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Apr;70(4):e30228.
19. Guzman G, Reed MR, Bielamowicz K, Koss B, Rodriguez A. CAR-T Therapies in Solid Tumors: Opportunities and Challenges. Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 May;25(5):479-89.
20. Zarrabi A, Perrin D, Kavoosi M, Sommer M, Sezen S, Mehrbod P, et al. Rhabdomyosarcoma: Current Therapy, Challenges, and Future Approaches to Treatment Strategies. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 2;15(21):5269.
21. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 19;357(3):266-81.
22. Umar M, Sastry KS, Chouchane AI. Role of Vitamin D Beyond the Skeletal Function: A Review of the Molecular and Clinical Studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 May 30;19(6):1618.
23. Tamayo M, Martin-Nunes L, Val-Blasco A, Piedras MJ, Larriba MJ, Gómez-Hurtado N, et al. Calcitriol, the Bioactive Metabolite of Vitamin D, Increases Ventricular K+ Currents in Isolated Mouse Cardiomyocytes. Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 24;9:1186.
24. Jeon SM, Shin EA. Exploring vitamin D metabolism and function in cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2018 Apr 16;50(4):1-14.
25. Muñoz A, Grant WB. Vitamin D and Cancer: An Historical Overview of the Epidemiology and Mechanisms. Nutrients. 2022 Mar 30;14(7):1448.
26. Bandera Merchan B, Morcillo S, Martin-Nuñez G, Tinahones FJ, Macías-González M. The role of vitamin D and VDR in carcinogenesis: Through epidemiology and basic sciences. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Mar;167:203-18.
27. Bhoora S, Punchoo R. Policing Cancer: Vitamin D Arrests the Cell Cycle. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 6;21(23):9296.
28. Sîrbe C, Rednic S, Grama A, Pop TL. An Update on the Effects of Vitamin D on the Immune System and Autoimmune Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 29;23(17):9784.
29. Uhmann A, Niemann H, Lammering B, Henkel C, Heß I, Rosenberger A, et al. Calcitriol inhibits hedgehog signaling and induces vitamin d receptor signaling and differentiation in the patched mouse model of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Sarcoma. 2012;2012:357040.
30. Trump DL, Hershberger PA, Bernardi RJ, Ahmed S, Muindi J, Fakih M, Yu WD, Johnson CS. Anti-tumor activity of calcitriol: pre-clinical and clinical studies. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 May;89-90(1-5):519-26.
31. Seraphin G, Rieger S, Hewison M, Capobianco E, Lisse TS. The impact of vitamin D on cancer: A mini review. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2023 Jul;231:106308.
32. Trump DL. Calcitriol and cancer therapy: A missed opportunity. Bone Rep. 2018 Jun 13;9:110-9.
33. Shabahang M, Buffan AE, Nolla JM, Schumaker LM, Brenner RV, Buras RR, et al. The effect of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the growth of soft-tissue sarcoma cells as mediated by the vitamin D receptor. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996 Mar;3(2):144-9.